On May 31, 2019 2:06:46 AM GMT+02:00, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2019 09:10:13 -0700 Randy Dunlap
> wrote:
> >
> > on i386 or x86_64:
> > when CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL is not set/enabled:
> >
> > ld: drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback_table.o:(.data+0x1c):
> undefined re
Hi all,
On Thu, 30 May 2019 09:10:13 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> on i386 or x86_64:
> when CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL is not set/enabled:
>
> ld: drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback_table.o:(.data+0x1c): undefined
> reference to `sysctl_vals'
> ld: drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback_table.o:(.da
On 5/29/19 11:21 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20190529:
>
on i386 or x86_64:
when CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL is not set/enabled:
ld: drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback_table.o:(.data+0x1c): undefined
reference to `sysctl_vals'
ld: drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback_tab
Hi all,
Changes since 20190529:
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The userns tree gained a conflict against the arc-current tree.
The akpm-current tree lost its build failure but gained another for
which I applied a patch. It also gained a boot failure so I reverted
2 c
Hi all,
Changes since 20180529:
New tree: cisco
The drm-intel-fixes tree lost its build failure.
The kbuild tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20180529.
The dma-mapping tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against the arm tree
Hi all,
Changes since 20170529:
New trees: reset, reset-fixes
The nand tree gained a conflict against the jc_docs tree.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3099
3410 files changed, 126865 insertions(+), 68052 deletions(-)
--
On Monday 30 May 2016 08:52 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20160527:
Hi All,
I have just built and booted with next-20160530 and my dmesg is full of
warnings from ath9k. Last kernel tested was v4.6 and there was no
problem with that.
The traces are like:
Call Trace:
[]
Hi all,
Changes since 20160527:
My fixes tree is empty again.
The akpm tree lost a patch that turned up elsewhere.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 469
415 files changed, 11919 insertions(+), 4156 deletions(-)
---
Hi all,
The powerpc allyesconfig is again broken more than usual.
Changes since 20140529:
The mmc tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The omap_dss2 tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree.
I added a couple of supplied patches to the tip tree.
The tty tree lost i
Hi Nicolas,
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013 10:45:15 +0200 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>
> Is it possible for you to move the building to the replacement defconfigs:
> at91sam9260_9g20_defconfig
> at91sam9261_9g10_defconfig
Done.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au
pgp_G__qS2WpD
On 03/06/2013 08:36, Stephen Rothwell :
Hi Geert,
On Thu, 30 May 2013 10:07:48 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
The following defconfigs fail without anything useful in the log:
- at91sam9g20_defconfig
- at91sam9261_defconfig
- at91sam9260_defconfig
A manual run reveals why:
Can't f
Hi Geert,
On Thu, 30 May 2013 10:07:48 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
>
> The following defconfigs fail without anything useful in the log:
> - at91sam9g20_defconfig
> - at91sam9261_defconfig
> - at91sam9260_defconfig
>
> A manual run reveals why:
> Can't find default configuration "arch
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Changes since 20130529:
The following defconfigs fail without anything useful in the log:
- at91sam9g20_defconfig
- at91sam9261_defconfig
- at91sam9260_defconfig
A manual run reveals why:
Can't find default configuration "arch/arm/
Hi all,
Changes since 20130529:
The xen-arm tree lost its build failure.
The net-next tree lost its build warning.
I have created today's linux-next tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-nex
14 matches
Mail list logo
