Re: linux-next: Tree for May 19 (block/rnbd/)

2020-05-20 Thread Danil Kipnis
Hi Randy, On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 8:59 PM Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 5/19/20 11:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > News: there will be no linux-next release tomorrow. > > > > Changes since 20200518: > > > > seen on i386: > > when CONFIG_MODULES is not set/enabled: > > ../drivers/b

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 19 (i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.o)

2020-05-20 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 05:24:30PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 5/19/20 11:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > News: there will be no linux-next release tomorrow. > > > > Changes since 20200518: > > > > on i386: > > ERROR: modpost: "__udivdi3" [drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.k

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 19 (i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.o)

2020-05-19 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 5/19/20 11:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > News: there will be no linux-next release tomorrow. > > Changes since 20200518: > on i386: ERROR: modpost: "__udivdi3" [drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.ko] undefined! ERROR: modpost: "__divdi3" [drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.ko] undefine

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 19 (block/rnbd/)

2020-05-19 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 5/19/20 11:03 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > News: there will be no linux-next release tomorrow. > > Changes since 20200518: > seen on i386: when CONFIG_MODULES is not set/enabled: ../drivers/block/rnbd/rnbd-clt-sysfs.c: In function 'rnbd_clt_remove_dev_symlink': ../drivers/blo

linux-next: Tree for May 19

2020-05-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, News: there will be no linux-next release tomorrow. Changes since 20200518: My fixes tree contains: cd2b06ec45d6 ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning") The mtd-fixes tree lost its build failure. The qcom tree lost its build failure. The ipsec-next tree gained a conflict

linux-next: Tree for May 19

2017-05-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170518: The netfilter tree still had its build failure for which I applied a supplied fix patch. The drm-intel tree gained a conflict against the drm tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1926 2098 files changed, 66645 insertions(+), 43483 deletions(-) ---

linux-next: Tree for May 19

2016-05-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any v4.8 destined material to your linux-next included branches until after v4.7-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20160518: The nfs tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree and a build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch. The vfs tree gained a conflict

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 19 (arm:vexpress qemu failure due to FB patch)

2015-05-27 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:33:03AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 05/20/2015 12:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:02:36PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >>On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 05:30:01PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>>Hi all, > >>> > >>>Changes since 20150518:

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 19 (arm:vexpress qemu failure due to FB patch)

2015-05-27 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 05/20/2015 12:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:02:36PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 05:30:01PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20150518: The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. Non-merge commits (r

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 19 (arm:vexpress qemu failure due to FB patch)

2015-05-20 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:02:36PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 05:30:01PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20150518: > > > > The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree):

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 19 (arm:vexpress qemu failure due to FB patch)

2015-05-20 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (05/19/15 23:02), Guenter Roeck wrote: > Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 23:02:36 -0700 > From: Guenter Roeck > To: Stephen Rothwell > Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Scot Doyle > , Pavel Machek , Greg Kroah-Hartman > > Subject: Re: linux-

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 19 (arm:vexpress qemu failure due to FB patch)

2015-05-19 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 05:30:01PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150518: > > The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4713 > 4246 files changed, 207445 insertions(+), 103657 deletions(-) > > ---

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 19 (sound/soc/atmel/)

2015-05-19 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/19/15 00:30, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150518: > on x86_64: sound/built-in.o: In function `atmel_ssc_set_audio': (.text+0x87d90): undefined reference to `atmel_pcm_pdc_platform_register' sound/built-in.o: In function `atmel_ssc_put_audio': (.text+0x8879a): unde

linux-next: Tree for May 19

2015-05-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150518: The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4713 4246 files changed, 207445 insertions(+), 103657 deletions(-) I have crea

linux-next: Tree for May 19

2014-05-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20140516: My fixes tree contains: powerpc/ppc64: Allow allmodconfig to build (finally !) The gpio tree lost its build failure. The pm tree gained a conflict against the samsung tree. The net-next tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20140516