Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (input/misc/iqs269a.c & regmap)

2020-05-22 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 11:22:39AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 5/18/20 9:20 AM, Jeff LaBundy wrote: > > Hi Randy et al, > > > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 08:42:43AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 5/18/20 3:57 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Changes since 20200515: > >>>

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (input/misc/iqs269a.c & regmap)

2020-05-22 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 5/18/20 9:20 AM, Jeff LaBundy wrote: > Hi Randy et al, > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 08:42:43AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 5/18/20 3:57 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20200515: >>> >> >> on i386: >> >> >> CONFIG_REGMAP_I2C=y >> CONFIG_I2C=m >> >> WARNING: unme

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c)

2020-05-18 Thread Danil Kipnis
Hi Randy, On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 5:01 PM Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 5/18/20 3:57 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20200515: > > > > on i386: > > ../drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c: In function ‘alloc_sess’: > ../drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c:1447:42:

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (x86/mm/pgtable.c)

2020-05-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 5/18/20 3:57 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200515: > Hi, I don't know if this is a 'tip' thing or a gcc version thing or if it's only on i386 + certain configs, but I only see it on i386 builds from today's linux-next or mmotm of 20200515. ../arch/x86/mm/pgtable.

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (input/misc/iqs269a.c & regmap)

2020-05-18 Thread Jeff LaBundy
Hi Randy et al, On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 08:42:43AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 5/18/20 3:57 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20200515: > > > > on i386: > > > CONFIG_REGMAP_I2C=y > CONFIG_I2C=m > > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for REGMAP_I2C >

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (input/misc/iqs269a.c & regmap)

2020-05-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 5/18/20 3:57 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200515: > on i386: CONFIG_REGMAP_I2C=y CONFIG_I2C=m WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for REGMAP_I2C Depends on [m]: I2C [=m] Selected by [y]: - INPUT_IQS269A [=y] && !UML && INPUT [=y] && INPUT_MISC [=y

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c)

2020-05-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 5/18/20 3:57 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200515: > on i386: ../drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c: In function ‘alloc_sess’: ../drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c:1447:42: error: ‘BLK_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you me

linux-next: Tree for May 18

2020-05-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20200515: My fixes tree contains: bc0714455848 ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning") 7c865b3b52d1 ("drm/msm: Fix undefined "rd_full" link error") The mtd-fixes tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. The qcom tree still had its build fai

linux-next: Tree for May 18

2017-05-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170517: The netfilter tree still had its build failure for which I applied a supplied fix patch. The file-locks tree lost its build failure. The sound tree lost its build failure. The scsi-mkp tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 14

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (rcu/tree)

2016-05-18 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 08:19:36AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 05/17/16 21:30, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Please do not add any v4.8 destined material to your linux-next included > > branches until after v4.7-rc1 has been released. Apologies, I put rcu/next in the wrong place

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (rcu/tree)

2016-05-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/17/16 21:30, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Please do not add any v4.8 destined material to your linux-next included > branches until after v4.7-rc1 has been released. > > Changes since 20160517: > on i386: In file included from ../kernel/rcu/tree.c:4209:0: ../kernel/rcu/tree_plug

linux-next: Tree for May 18

2016-05-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any v4.8 destined material to your linux-next included branches until after v4.7-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20160517: New tree: dax-misc The dax-misc tree gained a conflict against the nvdimm tree. The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against the dax-misc

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (mm/memory-failure.c)

2015-05-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, On Thu, 21 May 2015 10:17:48 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > On Wed, 20 May 2015 13:03:20 -0700 Andrew Morton > wrote: > > > > I dropped > > > > memory-failure-export-page_type-and-action-result.patch > > memory-failure-change-type-of-action_results-param-3-to-enum.patch > > trac

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (mm/memory-failure.c)

2015-05-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andrew, On Wed, 20 May 2015 13:03:20 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > I dropped > > memory-failure-export-page_type-and-action-result.patch > memory-failure-change-type-of-action_results-param-3-to-enum.patch > tracing-add-trace-event-for-memory-failure.patch OK, I have dropped them from linu

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (mm/memory-failure.c)

2015-05-20 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 20 May 2015 13:41:57 +0800 Xie XiuQi wrote: > On 2015/5/19 10:49, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 08:20:07AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 05/18/15 01:52, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Changes since 20150515: > >>> > >> > >> on i386: > >> > >> m

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (mm/memory-failure.c)

2015-05-19 Thread Xie XiuQi
On 2015/5/20 14:09, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 01:41:57PM +0800, Xie XiuQi wrote: > ... >> >> Hi Naoya, >> >> This patch will introduce another build error with attched config file. >> >> drivers/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0x500): multiple definition of >> `__tracepoint_aer_ev

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (mm/memory-failure.c)

2015-05-19 Thread Naoya Horiguchi
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 01:41:57PM +0800, Xie XiuQi wrote: ... > > Hi Naoya, > > This patch will introduce another build error with attched config file. > > drivers/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0x500): multiple definition of > `__tracepoint_aer_event' > mm/built-in.o:(__tracepoints+0x398): first d

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (mm/memory-failure.c)

2015-05-19 Thread Naoya Horiguchi
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:46:36AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: ... > > diff --git a/include/ras/ras_event.h b/include/ras/ras_event.h > > index 1443d79e4fe6..43054c0fcf65 100644 > > --- a/include/ras/ras_event.h > > +++ b/include/ras/ras_event.h > > @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ > > #undef TRACE_SYSTEM > > #d

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (mm/memory-failure.c)

2015-05-19 Thread Xie XiuQi
On 2015/5/19 10:49, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 08:20:07AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 05/18/15 01:52, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20150515: >>> >> >> on i386: >> >> mm/built-in.o: In function `action_result': >> memory-failure.c:(.text+0x344a

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (mm/memory-failure.c)

2015-05-19 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 19 May 2015 02:49:34 + Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 08:20:07AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 05/18/15 01:52, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20150515: > > > > > > > on i386: > > > > mm/built-in.o: In function `action_result':

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (mm/memory-failure.c)

2015-05-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/18/15 19:49, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 08:20:07AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 05/18/15 01:52, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20150515: >>> >> >> on i386: >> >> mm/built-in.o: In function `action_result': >> memory-failure.c:(.text+0x344a5

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (mm/memory-failure.c)

2015-05-18 Thread Naoya Horiguchi
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 08:20:07AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 05/18/15 01:52, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20150515: > > > > on i386: > > mm/built-in.o: In function `action_result': > memory-failure.c:(.text+0x344a5): undefined reference to > `__tracepoint_mem

Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (mm/memory-failure.c)

2015-05-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/18/15 01:52, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150515: > on i386: mm/built-in.o: In function `action_result': memory-failure.c:(.text+0x344a5): undefined reference to `__tracepoint_memory_failure_event' memory-failure.c:(.text+0x344d5): undefined reference to `__trac

linux-next: Tree for May 18

2015-05-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150515: The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree. The target-updates tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4438 4109 files changed, 202202 insertions(+), 100037 deletions(-) ---