Hi all,
Changes since 20210303:
The ipsec tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The tip tree lost its build failure.
The pinctrl tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20210303.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1419
1507 files changed, 35931 insertions(
Hi all,
Please do not add any code destined for v5.2 to your linux-next included
branches until after v5.1-rc1 has been released.
News: I will not be doing linux-next releases from next Thursday (Mar
7) to the following Friday (Mar 15). Sorry this happened to fall
across most of the merge window
Hi all,
Changes since 20160303:
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The device-mapper tree gained a build failure so I used the version
from next-20160303.
The tip tree lost its build failure.
The rcu tree gained a conflict against the tip tree.
The kvm tree gained a con
On 03/03/15 20:03, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20150303:
>
on i386 or x86_64:
CC drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.o
../drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c: In function 'ec_response_timed_out':
../drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_lpc.c:40:3: error: implicit dec
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 03:03:41PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20150303:
>
> The md tree still had its build failure so I applied a fix patch.
>
> The mfd tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> next-20150303.
>
> The clk tree still had its build
Hi all,
Changes since 20150303:
The md tree still had its build failure so I applied a fix patch.
The mfd tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20150303.
The clk tree still had its build failure so I again used the version
from next-20150225.
Non-merge commits (relative t
Hi all,
This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build.
Changes since 20140303:
The powerpc tree still had its build failure.
The mfd-lj tree lost its build failure but gained another so I used the
version from next-20140210.
The wireless-next tree still had its build failure
On 03/04/13 14:12, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04 2013 at 1:55pm -0500,
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>> On 03/03/13 19:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20130301:
>>>
>>> The device-mapper tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
>>>
>>
>>
>> on i386:
>>
>> driver
On Mon, Mar 04 2013 at 1:55pm -0500,
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/03/13 19:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20130301:
> >
> > The device-mapper tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
> >
>
>
> on i386:
>
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `is_discarded_obloc
On 03/04/2013 07:40 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/03/13 19:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20130301:
>>
>
> on x86_64:
>
> warning: (AD7606 && AD799X_RING_BUFFER && MXS_LRADC && IIO_ADIS_LIB_BUFFER &&
> INV_MPU6050_IIO && HID_SENSOR_ACCEL_3D && AD_SIGMA_DELTA && AD72
On 03/03/13 19:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130301:
>
on x86_64:
warning: (AD7606 && AD799X_RING_BUFFER && MXS_LRADC && IIO_ADIS_LIB_BUFFER &&
INV_MPU6050_IIO && HID_SENSOR_ACCEL_3D && AD_SIGMA_DELTA && AD7266 && AD7298 &&
AD7476 && AD7887 && AT91_ADC && MAX1363 &
Hi all,
Changes since 20130301:
The nfsd tree lost its build failure.
The pm tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20130301.
The device-mapper tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The ftrace tree lost its build failure.
The gpio tree gained a build failure so I us
12 matches
Mail list logo
