linux-next: Tree for Mar 3

2021-03-03 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20210302: The powerpc-fixes tree lost its build failure. The tip tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20210302. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1235 1290 files changed, 37370 insertions(+), 17856 deletions(-) --

linux-next: Tree for Mar 3

2017-03-02 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any material intended for v4.12 to your linux-next included branches until after v4.11-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20170302: The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I added a fix patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 646 792 files cha

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 3

2016-03-03 Thread Josh Poimboeuf
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 04:48:01PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 04:30:18PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 05:09:26PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20160302: > > > > With next-20160301 and next-20160302

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 3

2016-03-03 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 03/03/2016 03:00 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 05:09:26PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20160302: With next-20160301 and next-20160302 I am having problem in allmodconfig build of x86_64. The error being: In file included from builtin-check.c:32

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 3

2016-03-03 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 04:30:18PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 05:09:26PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20160302: > > With next-20160301 and next-20160302 I am having problem in allmodconfig > build of x86_64. The error being: > > In

Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 3

2016-03-03 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 05:09:26PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160302: With next-20160301 and next-20160302 I am having problem in allmodconfig build of x86_64. The error being: In file included from builtin-check.c:32:0: elf.h:22:18: fatal error: gelf.h: No such

linux-next: Tree for Mar 3

2016-03-02 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160302: The samsung-krzk tree gained a conflict against the omap tree. The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net tree. The tip tree still had its build failure so I applied a supplied patch. The aio tree still had a build failure so I used the version from next

linux-next: Tree for Mar 3

2015-03-02 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150302: The md tree still had its build failure so I applied a fix patch. The clk tree still had its build failure so I again used the version from next-20150225. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2134 files changed, 64110 insertions(+), 50104 deletions(

linux-next: Tree for Mar 3

2014-03-03 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140228: The bcm2835 tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The imx-mxs tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The mfd-lj tree still had i