On 3/22/21 12:16 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 3/22/21 12:52 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Warning: Some of the branches in linux-next may still based on v5.12-rc1,
so please be careful if you are trying to bisect a bug.
News: if your -next included tree is based on Linus' tree tag
v5.12-rc
On 3/22/21 12:52 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Warning: Some of the branches in linux-next may still based on v5.12-rc1,
> so please be careful if you are trying to bisect a bug.
>
> News: if your -next included tree is based on Linus' tree tag
> v5.12-rc1{,-dontuse} (or somewhere bet
Hi all,
Warning: Some of the branches in linux-next may still based on v5.12-rc1,
so please be careful if you are trying to bisect a bug.
News: if your -next included tree is based on Linus' tree tag
v5.12-rc1{,-dontuse} (or somewhere between v5.11 and that tag), please
consider rebasing it onto
Hi all,
Changes since 20190321:
The amdgpu tree lost its build failure.
The drm-intel tree gained a conflict against the drm-intel-fixes tree.
The scsi tree lost its build failure.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2415
2026 files changed, 68546 insertions(+), 33551 deletions(-)
-
M list ; Zhang,
> Rui
> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 22 (thermal)
> Importance: High
>
> Rui,
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:36:38AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 03/22/2018 01:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> >
Rui,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:36:38AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/22/2018 01:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20180321:
> >
> > The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit.
> >
>
> on i386:
>
> ERROR: "nsec_to_clock_t" [drive
On 03/22/2018 01:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20180321:
>
> The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit.
>
on i386:
ERROR: "nsec_to_clock_t" [drivers/thermal/thermal_sys.ko] undefined!
so in drivers/thermal/thermal_sysfs.c, please add:
Hi all,
Changes since 20180321:
The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The rdma tree gained a conflict against the rdma-fixes tree.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the mac80211 tree.
The drm-intel tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The sou
Hi all,
Changes since 20170321:
The drm tree gained conflicts against the drm-intel-fixes tree.
The char-misc tree gained a conflict against the tpmdd tree.
The char-misc tree still had its build failure for which I applied a
fix patch.
The livepatching tree gained a conflict against the tip tr
Hi all,
Please do not add any v4.7 related material to your linux-next included
trees until after v4.6-rc1 is released.
Changes since 20160321:
The arm64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The rdma tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree.
The drm tree lost its build failure.
Non-me
Hi all,
Changes since 20130321:
New trees: mailbox, imx-mxs
Linus' tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The sound-asoc tree lost its build failures.
The tty tree lost one of its build failures but still had the other so I
used the version from next-20130319.
The usb
11 matches
Mail list logo
