Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (pinctrl && !CONFIG_OF)

2016-07-04 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> I merged it I think, Alex made a long series enabling compile >> testing and I started to cherry-pick the first commits to let >> them trickle in. > > I guess that when you do a git pull of a series of patches, you > sign the pull commit but

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (pinctrl && !CONFIG_OF)

2016-07-04 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 07/04/16 02:46, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 06/26/16 23:39, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20160624: >>> >> >> on i386, when CONFIG_OF is not enabled ... >> but OF_GPIO is enabled due to this in drivers/gpio/Kco

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (pinctrl && !CONFIG_OF)

2016-07-04 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 06/26/16 23:39, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20160624: >> > > on i386, when CONFIG_OF is not enabled ... > but OF_GPIO is enabled due to this in drivers/gpio/Kconfig: > > config OF_GPIO > def_bool y >

Re: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (pinctrl && !CONFIG_OF)

2016-06-28 Thread Alexander Stein
On Tuesday 28 June 2016, 10:37:52 wrote Arnd Bergmann: > > > I think the commit should just be reverted, it clearly breaks > > > stuff, and whatever needs it can be fixed in a better way. > > > > Why not depend PINCTRL_IPROC_GPIO on CONFIG_OF as Randy stated > > pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_pin

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (pinctrl && !CONFIG_OF)

2016-06-28 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:00:47 AM CEST Alexander Stein wrote: > On Monday 27 June 2016 23:36:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Monday, June 27, 2016 11:15:25 AM CEST Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 06/26/16 23:39, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > Changes since 20160624: > > > on

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (pinctrl && !CONFIG_OF)

2016-06-28 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 06/28/16 00:00, Alexander Stein wrote: > On Monday 27 June 2016 23:36:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Monday, June 27, 2016 11:15:25 AM CEST Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> On 06/26/16 23:39, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, >>> Changes since 20160624: >>> on i386, when CONFIG_OF is not enabled

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (pinctrl && !CONFIG_OF)

2016-06-28 Thread Alexander Stein
On Monday 27 June 2016 23:36:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday, June 27, 2016 11:15:25 AM CEST Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 06/26/16 23:39, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > Changes since 20160624: > > on i386, when CONFIG_OF is not enabled ... > > but OF_GPIO is enabled due to this

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (pinctrl && !CONFIG_OF)

2016-06-27 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday, June 27, 2016 11:15:25 AM CEST Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 06/26/16 23:39, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20160624: > > > > on i386, when CONFIG_OF is not enabled ... > but OF_GPIO is enabled due to this in drivers/gpio/Kconfig: > > config OF_GPIO > de

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (pinctrl && !CONFIG_OF)

2016-06-27 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 06/26/16 23:39, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160624: > on i386, when CONFIG_OF is not enabled ... but OF_GPIO is enabled due to this in drivers/gpio/Kconfig: config OF_GPIO def_bool y depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST (above from commit 1e4a80640338924b9