On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 09:49:51AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 6/24/20 11:34 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20200624:
> >
>
> on x86_64:
>
> kernel/exit.o: warning: objtool: __x64_sys_exit_group()+0x14: unreachable
> instruction
> kernel/cred.o: warning: objt
On 6/24/20 11:34 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20200624:
>
on x86_64:
kernel/exit.o: warning: objtool: __x64_sys_exit_group()+0x14: unreachable
instruction
kernel/cred.o: warning: objtool: override_creds()+0x4b: unreachable instruction
fs/btrfs/extent_io.o: warning: o
Hi all,
Changes since 20200624:
My fixes tree contains:
466d58f824f1 ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning")
9bd7b7c45d71 ("sched: Fix RANDSTRUCT build fail")
2f437faecf71 ("powerpc/boot/dts: Fix dtc "pciex" warnings")
The hid tree lost its build failure.
The tip tree still had
Hi all,
Changes since 20190624:
The arm64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The samsung-krzk tree gained conflicts against the arm-soc tree.
The tegra tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree.
The fbdev tree gained a conflict against the v4l-dvb tree and still had
its build fa
On 06/24/2018 10:43 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20180622:
>
on x86_64: (randconfig)
CC arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.o
In file included from ../include/linux/kernel.h:10:0,
from ../arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c:21:
../arch/x86/platform/efi/efi
Hi all,
Changes since 20180622:
New tree: drm-fixes
The cifs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20180622.
The drm tree gained a build failure for which I disabled some sample
code.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2098
2146 files changed, 64960 insertions(
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> > Changes since 20150624:
> >
> > The net-next tree lost its build failure.
>
> > $ git checkout -b akpm remotes/origin/akpm/master
> > Applying: net/netfilter/ipset: work around gcc-4
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Changes since 20150624:
>
> The net-next tree lost its build failure.
> $ git checkout -b akpm remotes/origin/akpm/master
> Applying: net/netfilter/ipset: work around gcc-4.4.4 initializer bug
I can confirm this patch (which I couldn't
Hi all,
Changes since 20150624:
The net-next tree lost its build failure.
The drm tree lost its build failure.
The modules tree still had its build failure so I applied a supplied
patch and gained another build failure for which I applied another patch.
The akpm tree gained a build failure for
Hi all,
The powerpc allyesconfig is again broken more than usual.
Changes since 20140624:
The staging tree still had its build failure for which I disabled a driver.
I applied a supplied patch to the akpm-current tree for a ppc build failure.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2076
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Sedat, All,
>
> On 2013-06-25 11:26 +0200, Sedat Dilek spake thusly:
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Yann E. MORIN
>> wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 25 June 2013 10:55:20 Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> >> Not sure what's going on, but I get this with
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Sedat, All,
>
> On 2013-06-25 11:28 +0200, Sedat Dilek spake thusly:
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Sedat Dilek
>> > wrote:
> [--SNIP--]
>> >> Not sure what's going on, but I
Sedat, All,
On 2013-06-25 11:26 +0200, Sedat Dilek spake thusly:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Yann E. MORIN
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 June 2013 10:55:20 Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> Not sure what's going on, but I get this with today's Linux-Next.
> >> ( Yesterday's next-20130624 was OK. )
>
Sedat, All,
On 2013-06-25 11:28 +0200, Sedat Dilek spake thusly:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
[--SNIP--]
> >> Not sure what's going on, but I get this with today's Linux-Next.
> >> ( Yesterday's next-20130624 was
Michal, All,
[Sorry for duplicates, I inadvertently sent HTML]
On Tuesday 25 June 2013 11:21:53 Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 June 2013 10:55:20 Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > Not sure what's going on, but I get this with today's Linux-Next.
> > ( Yesterday's next-20130624 was OK. )
> >
> > $ LAN
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 25.6.2013 11:26, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Yann E. MORIN
>> wrote:
>> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=a11650e11093ed57dca78bf16e7836517c599098
>>
>>> - for trista
On 25.6.2013 11:26, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Yann E. MORIN
> wrote:
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=a11650e11093ed57dca78bf16e7836517c599098
>
>> - for tristate choices, it is possible to select zero, one or more of the
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20130624:
>>>
>>> The vfs tree lost its build failure.
>>>
>>> The net-next tree gained a
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Sedat, All,
>
> On Tuesday 25 June 2013 10:55:20 Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> Not sure what's going on, but I get this with today's Linux-Next.
>> ( Yesterday's next-20130624 was OK. )
>>
>> $ LANG=C LC_ALL=C yes "" | make oldconfig && LANG=C LC_A
Sedat, All,
On Tuesday 25 June 2013 10:55:20 Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Not sure what's going on, but I get this with today's Linux-Next.
> ( Yesterday's next-20130624 was OK. )
>
> $ LANG=C LC_ALL=C yes "" | make oldconfig && LANG=C LC_ALL=C make
> silentoldconfig RapidIO support (RAPIDIO) [Y/n/?] y
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20130624:
>>
>> The vfs tree lost its build failure.
>>
>> The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
>>
>> The usb tree gained a confl
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130624:
>
> The vfs tree lost its build failure.
>
> The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
>
> The usb tree gained a conflict against the devicetree tree.
>
> The staging tree lost its buil
22 matches
Mail list logo
