Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (fs/io_uring)

2020-06-18 Thread Jens Axboe
On 6/17/20 11:38 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 6/17/20 9:15 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> News: there will be no linux-next release tomorrow. >> >> Changes since 20200617: >> > > when CONFIG_BLOCK is not set/enabled: > > ../fs/io_uring.c: In function 'io_async_task_func': > ../fs/io

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (fs/io_uring)

2020-06-17 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 6/17/20 9:15 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > News: there will be no linux-next release tomorrow. > > Changes since 20200617: > when CONFIG_BLOCK is not set/enabled: ../fs/io_uring.c: In function 'io_async_task_func': ../fs/io_uring.c:4559:7: error: implicit declaration of function

linux-next: Tree for Jun 18

2020-06-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, News: there will be no linux-next release tomorrow. Changes since 20200617: My fixes tree contains: 4cb4bfffe2c1 ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning") The ipsec tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree. The amdgpu tree still had its build failure so I used the version f

linux-next: Tree for Jun 18

2019-06-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190617: Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 6205 6844 files changed, 253749 insertions(+), 215807 deletions(-) I have created today's linux-next tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/li

linux-next: Tree for Jun 18

2018-06-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180615: Added trees: xarray, mlx5-next Removed tree: powerpc-pkey (finished with) The mac80211-next tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The xarray tree gained a build failure due to an interaction with the nvdimm tree for which I applied a fix. Non-merge commits

linux-next: Tree for Jun 18

2015-06-18 Thread Michael Ellerman
Hi all, Changes since 20150617: No new conflicts or build failures. (NB. I missed Andrew's mmotm update this morning, I'll pull that in to tomorrow's tree). Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 11154 9615 files changed, 1031513 insertions(+), 235796 deletions(-) --

Re: Build error - vmlinux.lds [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18]

2014-06-18 Thread Sachin Kamat
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 05:38:14PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 04:50:43PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I observ

Re: Build error - vmlinux.lds [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18]

2014-06-18 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 05:38:14PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 04:50:43PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I observe the following build error while building uImage for ARM. > >> > >> Ker

Re: Build error - vmlinux.lds [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18]

2014-06-18 Thread Sachin Kamat
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 04:50:43PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I observe the following build error while building uImage for ARM. >> >> Kernel: arch/arm/boot/Image is ready >> make[2]: *** No rule to make target >> `a

Re: Build error - vmlinux.lds [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18]

2014-06-18 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 04:50:43PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: > Hi, > > I observe the following build error while building uImage for ARM. > > Kernel: arch/arm/boot/Image is ready > make[2]: *** No rule to make target > `arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds', needed by > `arch/arm/boot/compress

Build error - vmlinux.lds [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18]

2014-06-18 Thread Sachin Kamat
Hi, I observe the following build error while building uImage for ARM. Kernel: arch/arm/boot/Image is ready make[2]: *** No rule to make target `arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds', needed by `arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux'. Stop. make[1]: *** [arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux] Error 2 ma

linux-next: Tree for Jun 18

2014-06-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, The powerpc allyesconfig is again broken more than usual. Changes since 20140617: Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 868 1021 files changed, 24269 insertions(+), 14775 deletions(-) I have created to

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 usb/chipidea)

2013-06-18 Thread Peter Chen
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:52:36AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 06/18/13 00:30, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Changes since 20130617: >> > >> >> >> on i386: >> >> # CONFIG_USB_PHY is not set >> >> drivers/built-in.

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 usb/chipidea)

2013-06-18 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:52:36AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 06/18/13 00:30, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20130617: > > > > > on i386: > > # CONFIG_USB_PHY is not set > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `ci_hdrc_probe': > core.c:(.text+0x20446b): undefi

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 usb/chipidea)

2013-06-18 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 06/18/13 00:30, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130617: > on i386: # CONFIG_USB_PHY is not set drivers/built-in.o: In function `ci_hdrc_probe': core.c:(.text+0x20446b): undefined reference to `of_usb_get_phy_mode' chipidea needs to depend on or select some kind of U