Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 29 (drivers/crypto/sa2ul.c)

2020-07-29 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 7/29/20 5:22 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200728: > on i386: ld: drivers/crypto/sa2ul.o: in function `sa_sha_digest': sa2ul.c:(.text+0x1faf): undefined reference to `sha512_zero_message_hash' sa2ul.c uses sha512_zero_message_hash, sha1_zero_message_hash, and sh

linux-next: Tree for Jul 29

2020-07-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20200728: My fixes tree contains: dbf24e30ce2e ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning") The vfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20200728. The printk tree lost its build failure but regained it via another build, so I reverted a commi

linux-next: Tree for Jul 29

2019-07-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190726: The sh tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The tip tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. I remerged the kspp-gustavo tree later to get some warning fixes. The akpm-current tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2

linux-next: Tree for Jul 29

2016-07-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add material destined for v4.9 to your linux-next included branches until after v4.8-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20160728: The vfs tree gained a build failure due to an interaction with Linus' tree. I applied a merge fix patch. The drm tree gained a conflict agai

linux-next: Tree for Jul 29

2015-07-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150728: The mfd tree gained a conflict against the pm tree. The akpm-current tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4572 4631 files changed, 220996 insertions(+), 110218 deletions(-) -

linux-next: Tree for Jul 29

2014-07-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20140728: The slave-dma tree lost its build failure. The modules tree still had its build failure so I used the version from next-20140725. The mmc-uh tree still had its build failure so I used the version from next-20140725. The tip tree still had its build failure, so I

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 29 (staging/gdm724x)

2013-07-29 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:04:41AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 07/28/13 23:39, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20130726: > > > > on i386: > # CONFIG_TTY is not set Thanks, now fixed. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kerne

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 29 (staging/gdm724x)

2013-07-29 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 07/28/13 23:39, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130726: > on i386: # CONFIG_TTY is not set ERROR: "tty_port_tty_get" [drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdmtty.ko] undefined! ERROR: "tty_port_close_end" [drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdmtty.ko] undefined! ERROR: "tty_register_driver" [

linux-next: Tree for Jul 29

2013-07-28 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20130726: The ext4 tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20130726. The drm tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The next-next tree gained a build failure for which I added a patch. The lblnet tree lost its build failure. The spi tree gained a