Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 (ahci_imx.c)

2013-07-26 Thread t...@kernel.org
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:25:21PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 04:58:14AM +, Zhu Richard-R65037 wrote: > > Hi Shawn: > > yes, it is. > > > > BTW, Should I re-send the AHCI_IMX patch-set or send out one stand-alone > > patch to fix this issue? > > > > I think an increme

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 (ahci_imx.c)

2013-07-25 Thread Shawn Guo
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 04:58:14AM +, Zhu Richard-R65037 wrote: > Hi Shawn: > yes, it is. > > BTW, Should I re-send the AHCI_IMX patch-set or send out one stand-alone > patch to fix this issue? > I think an incremental fixing patch is good. Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the

RE: linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 (ahci_imx.c)

2013-07-25 Thread Zhu Richard-R65037
PM To: Zhu Richard-R65037 Cc: Randy Dunlap; Stephen Rothwell; linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 (ahci_imx.c) On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 03:46:42AM +, Zhu Richard-R65037 wrote: > -Original Message

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 (ahci_imx.c)

2013-07-25 Thread Shawn Guo
l.org; > linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Zhu Richard-R65037 > Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 (ahci_imx.c) > > On 07/24/13 22:12, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20130724: > > > > on i386: > > # CONFIG_MFD_SYSCON is not set &g

RE: linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 (ahci_imx.c)

2013-07-25 Thread Zhu Richard-R65037
ll Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Zhu Richard-R65037 Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 (ahci_imx.c) On 07/24/13 22:12, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130724: > on i386: # CONFIG_MFD_SYSCON