Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 22 (drivers/net/vrf)

2020-07-22 Thread David Ahern
On 7/22/20 10:35 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 7/22/20 6:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20200721: >> > > on i386: > when CONFIG_SYSCTL is not set/enabled: > > ERROR: modpost: "sysctl_vals" [drivers/net/vrf.ko] undefined! > > thanks for the report; I'll send a patc

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 22 (sound/soc/tegra/snd-soc-tegra210-dmic)

2020-07-22 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 7/22/20 6:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200721: > on i386: ERROR: modpost: "__udivdi3" [sound/soc/tegra/snd-soc-tegra210-dmic.ko] undefined! ERROR: modpost: "__divdi3" [sound/soc/tegra/snd-soc-tegra210-dmic.ko] undefined! -- ~Randy Reported-by: Randy Dunlap

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 22 (drivers/net/vrf)

2020-07-22 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 7/22/20 6:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200721: > on i386: when CONFIG_SYSCTL is not set/enabled: ERROR: modpost: "sysctl_vals" [drivers/net/vrf.ko] undefined! -- ~Randy Reported-by: Randy Dunlap

linux-next: Tree for Jul 22

2020-07-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20200721: My fixes tree contains: dbf24e30ce2e ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning") The xtensa tree gained a conflict against the csky tree. The pci tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20200721. The bpf-next tree gained conflicts ag

linux-next: Tree for Jul 22

2019-07-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190719: The net tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The extcon tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 732 582 files changed, 19319 insertions(+), 13284 deletions(-) -

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 22

2016-07-22 Thread Paul Gortmaker
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: [...] > > For x86-64 allmod, I am seeing this issue for the 1st time today > in my local builds, even though it doesn't appear in sfr's builds: > > FATAL: drivers/input/evbug: sizeof(struct input_device_id)=312 is not > a modulo of the size

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 22

2016-07-22 Thread Paul Gortmaker
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:10 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160721: > > The powerpc tree gained a build failure for which I applied a fix patch. There still are new failures in corenet32/64 and mpc85xx; looks like: arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c:702:11: error: 'struct r

linux-next: Tree for Jul 22

2016-07-22 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160721: The powerpc tree gained a build failure for which I applied a fix patch. The fuse tree gained a build failure due to an interaction with the btrfs-kdave tree, so I applied a merge fix patch. The pm tree gained a build failure, so I used the version from next-2016

linux-next: Tree for Jul 22

2015-07-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150721: The nfsd tree lost its build failure. The wireless-drivers-next tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20150721. The kvms390 tree gained a conflict against the s390 tree. The gpio tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to

linux-next: Tree for Jul 22

2013-07-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20130719: The sound-asoc tree lost its build failure. I have created today's linux-next tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git (patches at http://www.kernel.org/