RE: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (scsi/ufs/exynos)

2020-09-09 Thread Alim Akhtar
ng List' ker...@vger.kernel.org>; 'linux-scsi' ; 'Santosh > Yaraganavi' ; 'Vinayak Holikatti' > ; 'Seungwon Jeon' > Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (scsi/ufs/exynos) > > > Randy, > > > I am still seeing this in lin

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (scsi/ufs/exynos)

2020-09-09 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Randy, > I am still seeing this in linux-next of 20200909. > Was there a patch posted that I missed and is not applied anywhere yet? This patch became a victim of dropping the Exynos changes in 5.9. I have added it back in. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (scsi/ufs/exynos)

2020-09-09 Thread Randy Dunlap
-scsi >> > s...@vger.kernel.org>; Santosh Yaraganavi ; >> Vinayak Holikatti ; Alim Akhtar >> ; Seungwon Jeon >> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (scsi/ufs/exynos) >> >> On 7/20/20 2:42 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>>

RE: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (scsi/ufs/exynos)

2020-07-21 Thread Alim Akhtar
yak Holikatti ; Alim Akhtar > ; Seungwon Jeon > Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (scsi/ufs/exynos) > > On 7/20/20 2:42 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20200717: > > > > on x86_64: > > WARNING: unmet direct dependenci

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (kernel/bpf/net_namespace)

2020-07-21 Thread Jakub Sitnicki
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:37 PM CEST, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 11:49 AM Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:51:54 -0700 Randy Dunlap >> wrote: >> > >> > on i386 or x86_64: >> > >> > # CONFIG_INET is not set >> > # CONFIG_NET_NS is not

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (arch/x86/kvm/)

2020-07-20 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 04:43:07AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Randy, > > On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:56:08 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > on x86_64: > > > > CC [M] arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.o > > In file included from ../include/linux/pid.h:5:0, > > from ../include/l

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (kernel/bpf/net_namespace)

2020-07-20 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 11:49 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:51:54 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > on i386 or x86_64: > > > > # CONFIG_INET is not set > > # CONFIG_NET_NS is not set > > > > ld: kernel/bpf/net_namespace.o: in function `bpf_netns_link_release':

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (kernel/bpf/net_namespace)

2020-07-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:51:54 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > on i386 or x86_64: > > # CONFIG_INET is not set > # CONFIG_NET_NS is not set > > ld: kernel/bpf/net_namespace.o: in function `bpf_netns_link_release': > net_namespace.c:(.text+0x32c): undefined reference to `bpf_sk_lookup_enable

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (arch/x86/kvm/)

2020-07-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Randy, On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:56:08 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > > on x86_64: > > CC [M] arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.o > In file included from ../include/linux/pid.h:5:0, > from ../include/linux/sched.h:14, > from ../include/linux/kvm_host.h:12, >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (arch/x86/kvm/)

2020-07-20 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 7/20/20 2:42 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200717: > on x86_64: CC [M] arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.o In file included from ../include/linux/pid.h:5:0, from ../include/linux/sched.h:14, from ../include/linux/kvm_host.h:12,

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (scsi/ufs/exynos)

2020-07-20 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 7/20/20 2:42 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200717: > on x86_64: WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for PHY_SAMSUNG_UFS Depends on [n]: OF [=n] && (ARCH_EXYNOS || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) Selected by [y]: - SCSI_UFS_EXYNOS [=y] && SCSI_LOWLEVEL [=y] && SCS

linux-next: Tree for Jul 20

2020-07-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20200717: My fixes tree contains: dbf24e30ce2e ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning") The tegra tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. I reverted 3 commits from the powerpc tree due to reported run time problems. The security tree still had its bui

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (drivers/memory/jz4780_nemc)

2018-07-20 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 07/20/2018 01:32 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20180719: > on i386 or x86_64: when CONFIG_OF is not enabled, COMPILE_TEST is set: ../drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c: In function 'jz4780_nemc_num_banks': ../drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c:72:3: error: implicit declaration

linux-next: Tree for Jul 20

2018-07-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180719: The powerpc tree gained a conflict against the powerpc-fixes tree. The pci tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The net-next tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. I also applied a supplied patch to work around a kconfig problem. The mfd tree gained

linux-next: Tree for Jul 20

2017-07-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170719: The kbuild tree still produces a large number of build warnings so I reverted a commit from it. The drm-misc tree gained conflict a conflict against the drm-intel tree. The userns tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20170719. Non-merge co

linux-next: Tree for Jul 20

2016-07-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160719: The fsl tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net tree. The wireless-drivers-next tree lost its build failure. The crypto tree gained a build failure for which I reverted 2 commits. The l2-mtd tree gaine

linux-next: Tree for Jul 20

2015-07-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150717: The cris tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The sound-asoc tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. I applied 2 patches to the regmap merge for warnings from an API change. The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree