ng List' ker...@vger.kernel.org>; 'linux-scsi' ;
'Santosh
> Yaraganavi' ; 'Vinayak Holikatti'
> ; 'Seungwon Jeon'
> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (scsi/ufs/exynos)
>
>
> Randy,
>
> > I am still seeing this in lin
Randy,
> I am still seeing this in linux-next of 20200909.
> Was there a patch posted that I missed and is not applied anywhere yet?
This patch became a victim of dropping the Exynos changes in 5.9. I have
added it back in.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
-scsi
>> > s...@vger.kernel.org>; Santosh Yaraganavi ;
>> Vinayak Holikatti ; Alim Akhtar
>> ; Seungwon Jeon
>> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (scsi/ufs/exynos)
>>
>> On 7/20/20 2:42 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
yak Holikatti ; Alim Akhtar
> ; Seungwon Jeon
> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (scsi/ufs/exynos)
>
> On 7/20/20 2:42 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20200717:
> >
>
> on x86_64:
>
> WARNING: unmet direct dependenci
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:37 PM CEST, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 11:49 AM Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:51:54 -0700 Randy Dunlap
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > on i386 or x86_64:
>> >
>> > # CONFIG_INET is not set
>> > # CONFIG_NET_NS is not
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 04:43:07AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Randy,
>
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:56:08 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > on x86_64:
> >
> > CC [M] arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.o
> > In file included from ../include/linux/pid.h:5:0,
> > from ../include/l
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 11:49 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:51:54 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > on i386 or x86_64:
> >
> > # CONFIG_INET is not set
> > # CONFIG_NET_NS is not set
> >
> > ld: kernel/bpf/net_namespace.o: in function `bpf_netns_link_release':
Hi all,
On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:51:54 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> on i386 or x86_64:
>
> # CONFIG_INET is not set
> # CONFIG_NET_NS is not set
>
> ld: kernel/bpf/net_namespace.o: in function `bpf_netns_link_release':
> net_namespace.c:(.text+0x32c): undefined reference to `bpf_sk_lookup_enable
Hi Randy,
On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:56:08 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> on x86_64:
>
> CC [M] arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.o
> In file included from ../include/linux/pid.h:5:0,
> from ../include/linux/sched.h:14,
> from ../include/linux/kvm_host.h:12,
>
On 7/20/20 2:42 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20200717:
>
on x86_64:
CC [M] arch/x86/kvm/mmu/page_track.o
In file included from ../include/linux/pid.h:5:0,
from ../include/linux/sched.h:14,
from ../include/linux/kvm_host.h:12,
On 7/20/20 2:42 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20200717:
>
on x86_64:
WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for PHY_SAMSUNG_UFS
Depends on [n]: OF [=n] && (ARCH_EXYNOS || COMPILE_TEST [=y])
Selected by [y]:
- SCSI_UFS_EXYNOS [=y] && SCSI_LOWLEVEL [=y] && SCS
Hi all,
Changes since 20200717:
My fixes tree contains:
dbf24e30ce2e ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning")
The tegra tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree.
I reverted 3 commits from the powerpc tree due to reported run time
problems.
The security tree still had its bui
On 07/20/2018 01:32 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20180719:
>
on i386 or x86_64:
when CONFIG_OF is not enabled, COMPILE_TEST is set:
../drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c: In function 'jz4780_nemc_num_banks':
../drivers/memory/jz4780-nemc.c:72:3: error: implicit declaration
Hi all,
Changes since 20180719:
The powerpc tree gained a conflict against the powerpc-fixes tree.
The pci tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. I also applied
a supplied patch to work around a kconfig problem.
The mfd tree gained
Hi all,
Changes since 20170719:
The kbuild tree still produces a large number of build warnings so I
reverted a commit from it.
The drm-misc tree gained conflict a conflict against the drm-intel tree.
The userns tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20170719.
Non-merge co
Hi all,
Changes since 20160719:
The fsl tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree.
The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net tree.
The wireless-drivers-next tree lost its build failure.
The crypto tree gained a build failure for which I reverted 2 commits.
The l2-mtd tree gaine
Hi all,
Changes since 20150717:
The cris tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The sound-asoc tree still had its build failure for which I applied
a patch.
I applied 2 patches to the regmap merge for warnings from an API change.
The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree
17 matches
Mail list logo