Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 10

2020-07-13 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 5:37 AM Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 7/12/20 7:27 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Thanks for replying. > > I've already got it built & working. Me too. 0.6.2 works for me. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 10

2020-07-12 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 7/12/20 7:27 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 7:20 PM Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >>> >>> Not that I am aware of at the moment. Does next-20200709 work? Does >>> Linus' tree work? The only obvious thing I can think of is commit >> >> I'm hitting this same thing on 5.8-rc5. (x86

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 10

2020-07-12 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 7:20 PM Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > Not that I am aware of at the moment. Does next-20200709 work? Does > > Linus' tree work? The only obvious thing I can think of is commit > > I'm hitting this same thing on 5.8-rc5. (x86_64) > > > 6ec4476ac825 ("Raise gcc version req

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 10

2020-07-12 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 7/12/20 7:19 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 7/12/20 3:01 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Andy, >> >> On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 18:56:04 +0300 Andy Shevchenko >> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 06:33:18PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Changes since 20200709: >>> >>> I can't build it

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 10

2020-07-12 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 7/12/20 3:01 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andy, > > On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 18:56:04 +0300 Andy Shevchenko > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 06:33:18PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> >>> Changes since 20200709: >> >> I can't build it on Debian with Sparse enabled >> >> CC init/m

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 10

2020-07-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Andy, On Sun, 12 Jul 2020 18:56:04 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 06:33:18PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Changes since 20200709: > > I can't build it on Debian with Sparse enabled > > CC init/main.o > init/main.c:760:20: warning: no previous protot

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 10

2020-07-12 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 06:33:18PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200709: > > My fixes tree contains: > > dbf24e30ce2e ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning") > b236d81d9e4f ("powerpc/boot/dts: Fix dtc "pciex" warnings") > > The kbuild tree still had

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 10 (drivers/net/phy/mdio-thunder & mdio-mvusb)

2020-07-10 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 7/10/20 1:33 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20200709: > on x86_64: ld: drivers/net/phy/mdio-thunder.o: in function `thunder_mdiobus_pci_probe': mdio-thunder.c:(.text+0x218): undefined reference to `devm_mdiobus_alloc_size' on i386: ERROR: modpost: "devm_mdiobus_a

linux-next: Tree for Jul 10

2020-07-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20200709: My fixes tree contains: dbf24e30ce2e ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning") b236d81d9e4f ("powerpc/boot/dts: Fix dtc "pciex" warnings") The kbuild tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit. The scmi tree lost its build failure

linux-next: Tree for Jul 10

2019-07-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190709: The m68knommu tree gained a conflict against the m68k-current tree. The iomap tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree. The rdma tree still had some build failures for which I applied patches. The tip tree gained a build failure due to an interaction with the c

linux-next: Tree for Jul 10

2018-07-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180709: The vfs tree gained conflicts against the overlayfs tree. The rdma tree gained a conflict against the rdma-fixes tree. The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against the pci tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 5017 5138 files changed, 186644 ins

linux-next: Tree for Jul 10

2017-07-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any v4.14 material to your linux-next included branches until after v4.13-rc1 has been released. Changes since 20170707: The unicore32 tree gained conflicts against the kbuild tree. The vfs tree gained a build failure for which I applied a hack patch. And another (from

linux-next: Tree for Jul 10

2015-07-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150709: The drm-intel tree gained conflicts against the drm-intel-fixes trees. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1420 1324 files changed, 75720 insertions(+), 21647 deletions(-) I h

linux-next: Tree for Jul 10

2014-07-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20140709: My fixes tree contains: powerpc: Disable RELOCATABLE for COMPILE_TEST with PPC64 The net tree lost its build failure. The net-next tree lost its build failure. The staging tree still had its build failure for which I disabled a driver. The akpm-current

linux-next: Tree for Jul 10

2013-07-09 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20130709: New trees: metag-fixes, drm-intel-fixes The ceph tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree. The slab tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20130709. The ftrace tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The akpm tree lost lots of patches