Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (drivers/gpu/drm/imx/parallel-display.o)

2021-01-08 Thread Philipp Zabel
On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 10:03 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 9:55 AM Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 1/6/21 7:01 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20210106: > > > > > > > on x86_64: > > > > ld: drivers/gpu/drm/imx/parallel-display.o: in function

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (drivers/gpu/drm/imx/parallel-display.o)

2021-01-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 9:55 AM Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 1/6/21 7:01 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20210106: > > > > on x86_64: > > ld: drivers/gpu/drm/imx/parallel-display.o: in function > `imx_pd_connector_get_modes': > parallel-display.c:(.text+0x8d): undefined

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (drivers/gpu/drm/imx/parallel-display.o)

2021-01-07 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 1/6/21 7:01 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20210106: > on x86_64: ld: drivers/gpu/drm/imx/parallel-display.o: in function `imx_pd_connector_get_modes': parallel-display.c:(.text+0x8d): undefined reference to `of_get_drm_display_mode' Full randconfig file is attac

linux-next: Tree for Jan 7

2021-01-06 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20210106: Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1554 1545 files changed, 58978 insertions(+), 25936 deletions(-) I have created today's linux-next tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linu

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7

2019-01-07 Thread Michael Ellerman
Michael Ellerman writes: > Michael Ellerman writes: >> Geert Uytterhoeven writes: >>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 5:08 AM Stephen Rothwell >>> wrote: Status of my local build tests will be at http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next . If maintainers want to give advice about cross co

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7

2019-01-07 Thread Michael Ellerman
Michael Ellerman writes: > Geert Uytterhoeven writes: >> Hi Stephen, Michael, >> >> Happy NY! Looking forward to lots of linux-next releases and build >> logs in 2019 ;-) >> >> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 5:08 AM Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> Status of my local build tests will be at >>> http://ki

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7

2019-01-07 Thread Michael Ellerman
Geert Uytterhoeven writes: > Hi Stephen, Michael, > > Happy NY! Looking forward to lots of linux-next releases and build > logs in 2019 ;-) > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 5:08 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Status of my local build tests will be at >> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next . If main

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7

2019-01-06 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Stephen, Michael, Happy NY! Looking forward to lots of linux-next releases and build logs in 2019 ;-) On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 5:08 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Status of my local build tests will be at > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next . If maintainers want to give > advice about cros

linux-next: Tree for Jan 7

2019-01-06 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190103: The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The akpm tree lost several patches that turned up in Linus' tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 473 523 files chang

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (microblaze qemu problems)

2015-01-07 Thread Michal Simek
On 01/08/2015 06:58 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:45:30PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 03:16:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20150106: >>> >>> *crickets* >>> >>> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1350

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (microblaze qemu problems)

2015-01-07 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:45:30PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 03:16:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20150106: > > > > *crickets* > > > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1350 > > 1543 files changed, 41856 insertions(+)

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (microblaze qemu problems)

2015-01-07 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 03:16:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150106: > > *crickets* > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1350 > 1543 files changed, 41856 insertions(+), 24250 deletions(-) > With this kernel I get the following WARNINGs (lots of h

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7

2015-01-07 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 09:00:34PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Am 07.01.2015 um 20:18 schrieb Guenter Roeck: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 10:09:22AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 09:30:22AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 08:33:10AM -

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7

2015-01-07 Thread Christian Borntraeger
Am 07.01.2015 um 20:18 schrieb Guenter Roeck: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 10:09:22AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 09:30:22AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 08:33:10AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:26:56AM -0800, Gu

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7

2015-01-07 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 10:09:22AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 09:30:22AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 08:33:10AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:26:56AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7

2015-01-07 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 09:30:22AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 08:33:10AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:26:56AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 03:16:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7

2015-01-07 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 08:33:10AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:26:56AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 03:16:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20150106: > > > > > > *crickets* > > > > > > Non-merge

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7

2015-01-07 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:26:56AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 03:16:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20150106: > > > > *crickets* > > > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1350 > > 1543 files changed, 41856 insertions(+)

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7

2015-01-07 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 03:16:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150106: > > *crickets* > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1350 > 1543 files changed, 41856 insertions(+), 24250 deletions(-) > > ---

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7

2015-01-06 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:16 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150106: > > *crickets* > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1350 > 1543 files changed, 41856 insertions(+), 24250 deletions(-) > Happy new year, this release is a very special for me. I had to appl

linux-next: Tree for Jan 7

2015-01-06 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150106: *crickets* Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1350 1543 files changed, 41856 insertions(+), 24250 deletions(-) I have created today's linux-next tree at git://git.kernel.org/

linux-next: Tree for Jan 7

2014-01-06 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140106: Dropped tree: sh (complex merge conflicts against very old commits) The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The net-next tree lost its build failure. The bluetooth tree gained a conflict ag

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)

2013-01-14 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:08:41PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 11:49 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu.h > > index 7f8e759..b5d30c3 100644 > > --- a/kernel/rcu.h > > +++ b/kernel/rcu.h > > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ > > #define __LINUX_RCU

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)

2013-01-14 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 11:49 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > diff --git a/kernel/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu.h > index 7f8e759..b5d30c3 100644 > --- a/kernel/rcu.h > +++ b/kernel/rcu.h > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ > #define __LINUX_RCU_H > > #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TRACE > +#include > #define RCU_TRACE(stmt) stmt >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)

2013-01-14 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:49:05AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 01/14/13 09:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 08:45:06AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 01/07/13 19:53, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:36:19PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > O

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)

2013-01-14 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 01/14/13 09:32, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 08:45:06AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 01/07/13 19:53, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:36:19PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 18:12 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 20

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)

2013-01-14 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 08:45:06AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 01/07/13 19:53, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:36:19PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > >> On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 18:12 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 09:59 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrot

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)

2013-01-07 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 01/07/13 19:53, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:36:19PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 18:12 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: >>> On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 09:59 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Paul, On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:16:27 -0800 "Paul E.

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)

2013-01-07 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:36:19PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 18:12 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 09:59 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:16:27 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney" > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > O

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)

2013-01-07 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 18:12 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 09:59 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:16:27 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney" > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 11:42:36AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > > > > on

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)

2013-01-07 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 06:31:41PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 10:24 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Stephen, can you send me the config that gave you that error. > > > > It was Randy and the config was in the mail the Paul cc'd you on. > > > > Ah, I didn't read

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)

2013-01-07 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 10:24 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Stephen, can you send me the config that gave you that error. > > It was Randy and the config was in the mail the Paul cc'd you on. > Ah, I didn't read that far. I'm use to just cutting off Paul's emails short anyway. He never trims

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)

2013-01-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Steve, On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 18:12:07 -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 09:59 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:16:27 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney" > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 11:42:36AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > > > > o

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)

2013-01-07 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 09:59 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:16:27 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney" > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 11:42:36AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > > on i386 or x86_64: > > > > > > ERROR: "trace_clock_local" [kernel/rcutorture

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)

2013-01-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Paul, On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:16:27 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 11:42:36AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > on i386 or x86_64: > > > > ERROR: "trace_clock_local" [kernel/rcutorture.ko] undefined! > > Hello, Randy, > > Did your build include the following, a

linux-next: Tree for Jan 7

2013-01-06 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20130104: Undropped tree: pekey The slave-dma tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20130104. The pekey tree lost its build failure. I have created today's linux-next tree