Hi all,
Changes since 20190129:
The drm-intel-fixes tree gained a build failure for which I reverted
a commit.
The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch.
The net-next tree lost its build failure.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4274
4785 files changed,
Hi all,
Please do not add any v4.17 material to your linux-next included branches
until after v4.16-rc1 has been released.
Changes since 20180129:
The userns tree still had its build failure for which I added a patch.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 10187
10050 files changed, 4260
Hi all,
There will be no linux-next release until Monday (next-20170130).
Changes since 20170125:
New tree: spi-nor
The drm tree lost its build failure.
The block tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20170125.
The tip tree gained a conflict against the drm-misc-fixes tr
Hi all,
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 17:49:01 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> There will be no linux-next release until Monday (next-20170130).
Obviously, this is not longer relevant :-)
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
On 02/01/2015 01:23 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:02:09PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20150129:
The arm-soc gained conflicts against the arm-current and arm trees.
The spi tree gained a
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:02:09PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20150129:
>>
>> The arm-soc gained conflicts against the arm-current and arm trees.
>>
>> The spi tree gained a build failure for which I reverte
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:02:09PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20150129:
>
> The arm-soc gained conflicts against the arm-current and arm trees.
>
> The spi tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
>
> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree):
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 05:01:58PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> Am 30.01.2015 um 15:25 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:02:09PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Changes since 20150129:
> >>
> >> The arm-soc gained conflicts against the ar
Hi Guenter,
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:25:20 -0800
Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:02:09PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20150129:
> >
> > The arm-soc gained conflicts against the arm-current and arm trees.
> >
> > The spi tree gained a build f
Hi Guenter,
Am 30.01.2015 um 15:25 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:02:09PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20150129:
>>
>> The arm-soc gained conflicts against the arm-current and arm trees.
>>
>> The spi tree gained a build failure for which I rev
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:02:09PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20150129:
>
> The arm-soc gained conflicts against the arm-current and arm trees.
>
> The spi tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
>
> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree):
Hi all,
Changes since 20150129:
The arm-soc gained conflicts against the arm-current and arm trees.
The spi tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 6300
6348 files changed, 255117 insertions(+), 131620 deletions(-)
--
Hi all,
Please do *not* add material destined for v3.15 to your linux-next
included trees until after v3.14-rc1 is released.
This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build.
Changes since 20140130:
Linus' tree lost its build failure.
The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against
13 matches
Mail list logo
