Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 21 (mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c)

2021-01-21 Thread Andrew Jeffery
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, at 06:37, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 1/20/21 11:28 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20210120: > > > > > Hi, > I suppose that I have some config combo that has not been tested. > > > on i386: > CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_OF_ASPEED=m > CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_O

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 21 (mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c)

2021-01-21 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 1/20/21 11:28 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20210120: > Hi, I suppose that I have some config combo that has not been tested. on i386: CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_OF_ASPEED=m CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_OF_ASPEED_TEST=y Full randconfig file is attached. In file included from ../driv

linux-next: Tree for Jan 21

2021-01-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20210120: The drm tree lost its build failure. The drm-intel tree still had its build failure so I have used the version from next-20210119. The drm-misc tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The devicetree tree gained a conflict against the net-next tree. Non-merg

linux-next: Tree for Jan 21

2019-01-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190118: The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. The netfilter-next tree gained build failures so I used the version from next-20190118. The mali-dp tree still had its failure for which I applied a merge fix patch. The imx-drm tree lost its

linux-next: Tree for Jan 21

2016-01-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Please do not add any material for v4.6 to your linux-next included branches until after v4.5-rc1 is released. Changes since 20160120: Undropped tree: akpm-current The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The pci tree gained a conflict aginst Linus' tree. The aio tree s

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 21

2015-01-21 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > n Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> Removed trees: (not updated for more that 1 year) > > Have you informed the corresponding maintainers? OK, I saw the other email. Sorry for the noise. Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 21

2015-01-21 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Stephen, On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Removed trees: (not updated for more that 1 year) > configfs > cpupowerutils > dwmw2 > embedded > ep93xx > fbdev > firmware > fsnotify > fw-nohz >

linux-next: Tree for Jan 21

2015-01-21 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150120: Removed trees: (not updated for more that 1 year) configfs cpupowerutils dwmw2 embedded ep93xx fbdev firmware fsnotify fw-nohz hwspinlock input-mt ixp4xx kconfig

linux-next: Tree for Jan 21

2014-01-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140117: Dropped tree: sh (complex merge conflicts against very old commits) imx-mxs (complex merge conflicts against the arm tree) The imx-mxs tree gained conflicts against the arm tree (so I dropp

linux-next: Tree for Jan 21

2013-01-20 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20130118: The powerpc tree still had a build failure. The security tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The driver-core tree lost its build failure. The tty tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The usb tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree and a build