linux-next: Tree for Jan 14

2021-01-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20210113: The drm tree still had its build failure so I used the version from next-20210107. The drm-intel tree still had its build failure from merging the drm tree, so I have used the version from next-20210108. The drm-misc tree lost its build failure, but gained anothe

linux-next: Tree for Jan 14

2019-01-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20190111: The vfs tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. It also gained conflicts against the vfs-fixes tree. The mali-dp tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20190111. The scsi tree gained conflicts against Linus' and the scsi

linux-next: Tree for Jan 14

2015-01-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150113: *crickets* Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2846 2773 files changed, 85954 insertions(+), 47224 deletions(-) I have created today's linux-next tree at git://git.kernel.org/

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (lowpan, 802.15.4)

2014-01-17 Thread Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Hello, On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 01/14/2014 03:54 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> >>> On 01/13/2014 09:51 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, This tree fails (more tha

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (lowpan, 802.15.4)

2014-01-17 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 01/17/2014 11:13 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 01/14/2014 03:54 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> >>> On 01/13/2014 09:51 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerp

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (lowpan, 802.15.4)

2014-01-17 Thread Stephen Warren
On 01/14/2014 03:54 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > Hello, > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >> On 01/13/2014 09:51 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. >>> >>> Changes since 20140113: >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (lowpan, 802.15.4)

2014-01-17 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 01/14/2014 02:54 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > Hello, > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> >> On 01/13/2014 09:51 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. >>> >>> Changes since 20140113: >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (lowpan, 802.15.4)

2014-01-15 Thread David Miller
From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 02:54:56 +0400 > David, Marcel, could you please consider the attached patch. Applied, thanks Dmitry. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordo

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (lowpan, 802.15.4)

2014-01-15 Thread Alexander Aring
Hi Dmitry, On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 02:54:56AM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > Hello, > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > On 01/13/2014 09:51 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig bu

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (lowpan, 802.15.4)

2014-01-14 Thread Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
Hello, On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 01/13/2014 09:51 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. > > > > Changes since 20140113: > > > > > on i386: > > net/built-in.o: In function `header_create'

linux-next: Tree for Jan 14

2014-01-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, This tree fails (more than usual) the powerpc allyesconfig build. Changes since 20140113: Dropped tree: sh (complex merge conflicts against very old commits) The powerpc tree still had its build failure. The v4l-dvb tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The tip tree gained a bui

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (mtd)

2013-01-15 Thread Artem Bityutskiy
On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 20:01 +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Randy Dunlap writes: > > ERROR: "byte_rev_table" [drivers/mtd/devices/docg3.ko] undefined! > > Thanks for the report. I have a trivial patch attached. Should it go through > Artem's tree or do you want to take it directly ? David just pi

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (mtd)

2013-01-14 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 01/14/13 11:01, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Randy Dunlap writes: >> ERROR: "byte_rev_table" [drivers/mtd/devices/docg3.ko] undefined! > > Thanks for the report. I have a trivial patch attached. Should it go through > Artem's tree or do you want to take it directly ? Acked-by: Randy Dunlap I sup

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (mtd)

2013-01-14 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Randy Dunlap writes: > ERROR: "byte_rev_table" [drivers/mtd/devices/docg3.ko] undefined! Thanks for the report. I have a trivial patch attached. Should it go through Artem's tree or do you want to take it directly ? Cheers. -- Robert ---8>--- >From 771d13b0094421b98310171d8794f2a793ec5d4d Mon

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (mtd)

2013-01-14 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 01/13/13 20:46, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20130111: > on x86_64: ERROR: "byte_rev_table" [drivers/mtd/devices/docg3.ko] undefined! Full randconfig file is attached. -- ~Randy # # Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT. # Linux/x86_64 3.8.0-rc3 Kernel Config

linux-next: Tree for Jan 14

2013-01-13 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20130111: Dropped tree: samung (many conflicts) Removed trees: fw-cputime, fw-sched (served their purpose) drop-experimental (merged into the driver-core tree) The ia64 tree lost its build failure. The powerpc tree still had its build failures. The pm tree gained