linux-next: Tree for Jan 12

2021-01-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20210111: The drm tree still had its build failure so I used the version from next-20210107. The drm-intel tree gained a build failure from merging the drm tree, so I have used the version from next-20210108. The drm-misc tree still had its build failure from merging the d

linux-next: Tree for Jan 12

2018-01-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180111: New tree: rdma-fixes The arm64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. The pm tree gained a conflict against the i2c tree. The net-next tree lost its build failure but gained another due to an interaction with the net tree for which I reverted a commit. The

linux-next: Tree for Jan 12

2017-01-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170111: New tree: aspeed The akpm-current tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2953 3790 files changed, 114528 insertions(+), 64138 deletions(-) ---

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 12 (build failures: m68k, ppc)

2015-01-15 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 01/15/2015 02:12 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: Build failures, seen since next-20150109: m68k:allmodconfig powerpc:ppc6xx_defconfig It looks like parisc is also suffering: http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresul

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 12 (build failures: m68k, ppc)

2015-01-15 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> > Build failures, seen since next-20150109: >> > m68k:allmodconfig >> > powerpc:ppc6xx_defconfig It looks like parisc is also suffering: http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12343847/ >> > Due to: >> > ER

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 12 (build failures: m68k, ppc)

2015-01-12 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 05:27:08PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 06:03:22PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Changes since 20150109: > >> > >> The usb-gadget-fixes tree gained a conflict aga

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 12 (build failures: m68k, ppc)

2015-01-12 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 06:03:22PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20150109: >> >> The usb-gadget-fixes tree gained a conflict against the usb.current tree. >> >> The net-next tree gained a build failure for whic

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 12 (build failures: m68k, ppc)

2015-01-12 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 06:03:22PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20150109: > > The usb-gadget-fixes tree gained a conflict against the usb.current tree. > > The net-next tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. > > The pinctrl tree gained a build f

linux-next: Tree for Jan 12

2015-01-11 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20150109: The usb-gadget-fixes tree gained a conflict against the usb.current tree. The net-next tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit. The pinctrl tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20150109. The akpm tree lost a few patches t