Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 23 [ fs/dcache.c: Root dentry has weird name ]

2013-02-25 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Al Viro wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 03:22:03PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Al Viro wrote: >> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 02:22:42PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > >> >> [ 120.310366] Root dentry has weird name >> > >> > Umm..

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 23 [ fs/dcache.c: Root dentry has weird name ]

2013-02-25 Thread Al Viro
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 03:22:03PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Al Viro wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 02:22:42PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > > >> [ 120.310366] Root dentry has weird name > > > > Umm... Almost certainly a result of switching to shmem_file_s

Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 23 [ fs/dcache.c: Root dentry has weird name ]

2013-02-25 Thread Al Viro
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 02:22:42PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > [ 120.310366] Root dentry has weird name Umm... Almost certainly a result of switching to shmem_file_setup() to d_alloc_pseudo(); I'll fix it (give the suckers ->d_op of their own). For now, just ignore the warning - it's harmless.