Hi all,
News: There will be no linux-next releases next Monday or Tuesday.
Changes since 20200827:
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3122
3668 files changed, 104159 insertions(+), 39605 deletions(-)
Hi all,
Changes since 20190827:
The drm-misc tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch.
The phy-next tree lost its build failure.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 8690
8857 files changed, 435848 insertions(+), 251879 deletions(-)
-
Hi all,
Changes since 20180827:
Dropped trees: xarray, ida (temporarily)
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 628
772 files changed, 25184 insertions(+), 6934 deletions(-)
I have created today's linux-next tr
Hi all,
Changes since 20170825:
The nfsd tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
next-20170824.
The net-next tree lost its build failure but gained a conflict against
the rockchip tree.
The l2-mtd tree gained a build failure due to an interaction with Linus'
tree for which I
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 06:27:12PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20150827:
>>
>> The rdma tree gained a conflict aaginst the net-next tree.
>>
>> The sound-asoc tree gained a build failure for which I reverted
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 06:27:12PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20150827:
>
> The rdma tree gained a conflict aaginst the net-next tree.
>
> The sound-asoc tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
>
> The mmc-uh tree lost its build failure.
>
> T
Hi all,
Changes since 20150827:
The rdma tree gained a conflict aaginst the net-next tree.
The sound-asoc tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The mmc-uh tree lost its build failure.
The tty tree still had its build failure for which I reverted part of
a commit.
The nvdi
Hi all,
Changes since 20140827:
The usb.current tree lost its build failure.
The percpu tree lost its build failure.
The staging tree still had its build failure for which I applied a
fix patch.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2146
2292 files changed, 58126 insertions(+), 36066 d
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:02:13AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> P.S.: The forgotten patch is now in usb-next, but I don't see any
> credits, coins, gold, platin...
Thank you for reporting this. Your name was mentioned in the tag Greg
pulled:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Sarah Sharp
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 07:39:14PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Dmitry Kasatkin
>> wrote:
>> Still noone answered me why "drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c" does NOT
>> include (dev_info_ratelimited() and other d
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 07:39:14PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Dmitry Kasatkin
> wrote:
> Still noone answered me why "drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c" does NOT
> include (dev_info_ratelimited() and other defines).
> I am expecting that... even I see...
>
>
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> On 28/08/13 19:59, Sarah Sharp wrote:
>> Please trim your replies.
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:53:49PM +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
>> That change seems to cause the problems:
>>
>> commit 0730d52a86919300a39a2be37f6c14099
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:18:24AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 09:59:38AM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > Please trim your replies.
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:53:49PM +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> > > >>> That change seems to cause the problems:
> > > >>>
> >
On 28/08/13 19:59, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> Please trim your replies.
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:53:49PM +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> That change seems to cause the problems:
>
> commit 0730d52a86919300a39a2be37f6c140997dfb82f
> "xhci:prevent "callbacks suppressed" when debug is
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 09:59:38AM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> Please trim your replies.
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:53:49PM +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> > >>> That change seems to cause the problems:
> > >>>
> > >>> commit 0730d52a86919300a39a2be37f6c140997dfb82f
> > >>> "xhci:prevent "call
Please trim your replies.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:53:49PM +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> >>> That change seems to cause the problems:
> >>>
> >>> commit 0730d52a86919300a39a2be37f6c140997dfb82f
> >>> "xhci:prevent "callbacks suppressed" when debug is not enabled"
> >>>
> >>> - Sedat -
> >>>
>
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Dmitry Kasatkin
> wrote:
>> On 28/08/13 13:46, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Dmitry Kasatkin
>>> wrote:
On 28/08/13 13:38, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:2
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Dmitry Kasatkin
wrote:
> On 28/08/13 13:46, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Dmitry Kasatkin
>> wrote:
>>> On 28/08/13 13:38, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Sedat Dilek
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Dmitry Kasatkin
wrote:
> On 28/08/13 13:46, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Dmitry Kasatkin
>> wrote:
>>> On 28/08/13 13:38, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Sedat Dilek
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at
On 28/08/13 13:46, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Dmitry Kasatkin
> wrote:
>> On 28/08/13 13:38, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Sedat Dilek
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:49
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Dmitry Kasatkin
> wrote:
>> On 28/08/13 13:38, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Sedat Dilek
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 2
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Dmitry Kasatkin
wrote:
> On 28/08/13 13:38, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Sedat Dilek
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
On 28/08/13 13:38, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130827:
The f2fs tree lost its build fail
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20130827:
>>>
>>> The f2fs tree lost its build failure.
>>>
>>> The md tree gained a conflict agai
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20130827:
>>
>> The f2fs tree lost its build failure.
>>
>> The md tree gained a conflict against the arm tree.
>>
>> The libata tree lost its build failure.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130827:
>
> The f2fs tree lost its build failure.
>
> The md tree gained a conflict against the arm tree.
>
> The libata tree lost its build failure.
>
> The spi tree lost its build failure.
>
> The arm-soc tree gai
Hi all,
Changes since 20130827:
The f2fs tree lost its build failure.
The md tree gained a conflict against the arm tree.
The libata tree lost its build failure.
The spi tree lost its build failure.
The arm-soc tree gained conflicts against the usb tree.
The dma-mapping tree gained a conflic
27 matches
Mail list logo
