Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 19 (bcache)

2021-04-19 Thread Coly Li
On 4/20/21 1:50 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 4/19/21 10:26 AM, Coly Li wrote: >> On 4/19/21 11:40 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> On 4/19/21 3:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Changes since 20210416: >>> >>> on x86_64: >>> >>> when >>> # CONFIG_BLK_DEV is not set >>> >>> >>> WAR

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 19 (bcache)

2021-04-19 Thread Jens Axboe
On 4/19/21 10:26 AM, Coly Li wrote: > On 4/19/21 11:40 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 4/19/21 3:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20210416: >>> >> >> on x86_64: >> >> when >> # CONFIG_BLK_DEV is not set >> >> >> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for LIBNVDIMM

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 19 (bcache)

2021-04-19 Thread Coly Li
On 4/19/21 11:40 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 4/19/21 3:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20210416: >> > > on x86_64: > > when > # CONFIG_BLK_DEV is not set > > > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for LIBNVDIMM > Depends on [n]: PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT [=y] &&

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 19 (bcache)

2021-04-19 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 4/19/21 3:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20210416: > on x86_64: when # CONFIG_BLK_DEV is not set WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for LIBNVDIMM Depends on [n]: PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT [=y] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && BLK_DEV [=n] Selected by [y]: - BCACHE_NV

linux-next: Tree for Apr 19

2021-04-19 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20210416: The powerpc tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch. The vfs tree gained conflicts against the f2fs and xfs trees. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 12643 11170 files changed, 606490 insertions(+), 274006 deletions(-)

RE: linux-next: Tree for Apr 19 (dell smbios SMM)

2018-04-20 Thread Mario.Limonciello
> > Hi, > I've attached it here. > > thanks, > -- > ~Randy Thanks. Darren's patch. It was supposed to be prevented by 32d7b19bad9695c4c9026b0ceb3a384561ddee70 (see comment in Kconfig). # # The DELL_SMBIOS driver depends on AC

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 19 (dell smbios SMM)

2018-04-20 Thread Randy Dunlap
orm Driver; Limonciello, Mario >> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 19 (dell smbios SMM) >> >> On 04/18/18 21:35, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20180418: >>> >> >> >> I see some patches

RE: linux-next: Tree for Apr 19 (dell smbios SMM)

2018-04-20 Thread Mario.Limonciello
> -Original Message- > From: Randy Dunlap [mailto:rdun...@infradead.org] > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 1:00 PM > To: Stephen Rothwell; Linux-Next Mailing List > Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; Platform Driver; Limonciello, Mario > Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 1

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 19 (dell smbios SMM)

2018-04-19 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 04/18/18 21:35, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20180418: > I see some patches from about 1 month ago for this, but it was either never fixed ... or it's back. on x86_64: WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for DELL_SMBIOS Depends on [m]: X86 [=y] && X86_PLAT

linux-next: Tree for Apr 19

2018-04-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20180418: New tree: modules-fixes I have added a patch to the arm-current tree to fix build problems discovered overnight. The sound-asoc tree lost its build failure. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 1055 1121 files changed, 36028 insertions(+), 19043 deletio

linux-next: Tree for Apr 19

2017-04-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20170418: The vfs tree gained a conflict against the sparc tree. The rcu tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20170418. The staging tree lost its build failures. The akpm tree lost its build failure and lost 2 patches that turned up elsewhere. Non-

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 19 (waketorture.c)

2016-04-19 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:34:10PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 04/19/16 12:05, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:55:21AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 04/19/16 09:56, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > >>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:20:24AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 19 (waketorture.c)

2016-04-19 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 04/19/16 12:05, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:55:21AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 04/19/16 09:56, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:20:24AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 04/18/16 22:13, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Change

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 19 (waketorture.c)

2016-04-19 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:55:21AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 04/19/16 09:56, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:20:24AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 04/18/16 22:13, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Changes since 20160418: > >>> > >> > >> on x86_64: >

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 19 (waketorture.c)

2016-04-19 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 04/19/16 09:56, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:20:24AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 04/18/16 22:13, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20160418: >>> >> >> on x86_64: >> >> kernel/built-in.o: In function `wake_torture_stats_print': >> waketorture.c

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 19 (waketorture.c)

2016-04-19 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:20:24AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 04/18/16 22:13, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20160418: > > > > on x86_64: > > kernel/built-in.o: In function `wake_torture_stats_print': > waketorture.c:(.text+0x2f06d): undefined reference to `trace

Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 19 (waketorture.c)

2016-04-19 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 04/18/16 22:13, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20160418: > on x86_64: kernel/built-in.o: In function `wake_torture_stats_print': waketorture.c:(.text+0x2f06d): undefined reference to `trace_clock_global' kernel/built-in.o: In function `wake_torture_waiter': waketorture.c

linux-next: Tree for Apr 19

2016-04-18 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Changes since 20160418: The tip tree still had its build failures and gainde a confict against the pm tree. The gpio tree lost its build failure. The akpm-current tree still had its build failure for which I applied a patch. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 4507 4203 files