Hi all,
News: there will be no linux-next release on Friday, Monday or Thursday
April 25.
Changes since 20190417:
The bpf-next tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch.
The drm tree still had its build failure for which I disabled a driver.
The fix is in the drm-misc tree where I
Hi all,
Changes since 20180417:
Removed tree: efi-lock-down (temporarily at maintainer's request)
The netfilter tree lost its build failure.
The sound-asoc tree lost its build failure but gained aonther so I have
used the version from next-20180416.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree):
Hi all,
Changes since 20170413:
The thermal-soc tree gained a conflict against the pm tree.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The block tree gained a build failure due to an interaction with the
net-next tree for which I applied a merge fix patch.
The staging tree gaine
Hi all,
Changes since 20160415:
The net-next tree gained conflicts against the net tree.
The tip tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a commit
and gained another for which I applied a build fix.
The gpio tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20160415.
The
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Davidlohr Bueso
wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 02:19 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Linus Torvalds
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Sedat Dilek
>> >> wrot
On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 02:19 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Linus Torvalds
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Davidlohr pointed to this patch (tested the triplet):
>
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 04/20/2013 08:46 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
>> I have started a new thread "[next-20130419] ipc: sem: BROKEN", please
>> use this one!
>>
>> Thanks for all your feedback!
>>
>> - Sedat -
>>
>> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=136646172915
On 04/20/2013 08:46 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
I have started a new thread "[next-20130419] ipc: sem: BROKEN", please
use this one!
Thanks for all your feedback!
- Sedat -
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=136646172915261&w=2
I suspect most of us are not subscribed to the linux-next mailing
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Linus Torvalds
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Davidlohr pointed to this patch (tested the triplet):
>>>
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> Davidlohr pointed to this patch (tested the triplet):
>
> ipc, sem: do not call sem_lock when bogus sma:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/31/12
>
> Is that what you mean?
Yup.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubsc
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>
>> See attached dmesg.
>
> This still has the bug Davidlohr pointed at:
>
>>> This looks like what Emmanuel was/is running into:
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/30/1
>
> you need to m
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> See attached dmesg.
This still has the bug Davidlohr pointed at:
>> This looks like what Emmanuel was/is running into:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/30/1
you need to move the "IS_ERR()" check before the sem_lock.
Linus
--
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 02:24:10PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> > I have applied all three patches and see still call-traces.
> > New are apparmor related messages.
>
> Can you try the crazy rcu double-free debug hack?
>
> See
>
>
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> I have applied all three patches and see still call-traces.
> New are apparmor related messages.
Can you try the crazy rcu double-free debug hack?
See
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/30/113
and I'm re-attaching the ugly-ass crazy hack pa
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 15:19 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 04/19/2013 02:53 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> >> I tried to switch from SLUB to SLAB...
> >>
> >> ...and also from VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN to TICK_CPU_ACCOUNTING.
> >>
> >> 2x NOPE.
On 04/19/2013 02:53 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
I tried to switch from SLUB to SLAB...
...and also from VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN to TICK_CPU_ACCOUNTING.
2x NOPE.
In one kernel-build I saw in my console...
semop(1): encountered an error: I
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> On
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Daniel Vetter
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On T
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>>> wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130417:
New Tre
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20130417:
>>>
>>> New Trees: rpmsg (actually added yesterday)
>>> pp
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20130417:
>>
>> New Trees: rpmsg (actually added yesterday)
>> ppc-temp (replacing powerpc for this week)
>>
>> The ceph tree gain
21 matches
Mail list logo
