Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the bpf-next tree

2018-12-12 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 04:37:28PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Alexei, > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 20:33:41 -0800 Alexei Starovoitov > wrote: > > > > If Stephen's scripts can recognize SOB anywhere in the log then > > --signoff can theoretically solve it. > > My script just grabs all the Si

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the bpf-next tree

2018-12-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Alexei, On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 20:33:41 -0800 Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > If Stephen's scripts can recognize SOB anywhere in the log then > --signoff can theoretically solve it. My script just grabs all the Signed-off-by lines in the commit message. > Unfortunately it's "Incompatible with th

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the bpf-next tree

2018-12-12 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 04:45:26PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Alexei Starovoitov > Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:39:10 -0800 > > > But this approach doesn't scale. > > We do rebase our trees when we need to fixup or drop patches and > > at any given point a number of commits will be committed

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the bpf-next tree

2018-12-12 Thread David Miller
From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:39:10 -0800 > But this approach doesn't scale. > We do rebase our trees when we need to fixup or drop patches and > at any given point a number of commits will be committed by me > and another set by Daniel. When we rebase we cannot keep adding >

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the bpf-next tree

2018-12-12 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 3:45 PM Bart Van Assche wrote: > > Are you aware of Linus' opinion about rebasing? If not, please have a look > at https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/26/71 or https://lwn.net/Articles/328436/. very much aware. above is not applicable to this use case.

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the bpf-next tree

2018-12-12 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 15:39 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:48:20AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Alexei, > > > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 12:53:11 -0800 Alexei Starovoitov > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 07:32:45AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the bpf-next tree

2018-12-12 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:48:20AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Alexei, > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 12:53:11 -0800 Alexei Starovoitov > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 07:32:45AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Commits > > > > > > 3bdc28aa2340 ("selftests/b

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the bpf-next tree

2018-12-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Alexei, On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 12:53:11 -0800 Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 07:32:45AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Commits > > > > 3bdc28aa2340 ("selftests/bpf: add btf annotations for > > cgroup_local_storage maps") > > 1dfd1959fed4 ("bpf: a

Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the bpf-next tree

2018-12-12 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 07:32:45AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Commits > > 3bdc28aa2340 ("selftests/bpf: add btf annotations for cgroup_local_storage > maps") > 1dfd1959fed4 ("bpf: add bpffs pretty print for cgroup local storage maps") > 3adc62d9a5be ("bpf: pass struct btf

linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the bpf-next tree

2018-12-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Commits 3bdc28aa2340 ("selftests/bpf: add btf annotations for cgroup_local_storage maps") 1dfd1959fed4 ("bpf: add bpffs pretty print for cgroup local storage maps") 3adc62d9a5be ("bpf: pass struct btf pointer to the map_check_btf() callback") 9cf3a785dc4c ("selftests/bpf: use __b