On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 08:08:14AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 19:36 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 08:07:44PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:05 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> > > > On my openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 system running v2.6.24-rc
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 19:36 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 08:07:44PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:05 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> > > On my openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 system running v2.6.24-rc1-281-g22d2aa1,
> > > I get the sysfs rename messages.
> >
> > Care
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 08:07:44PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:05 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> > On my openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 system running v2.6.24-rc1-281-g22d2aa1,
> > I get the sysfs rename messages.
>
> Care to try this? Seems like a silly bug in the core if
> SYSFS_DEP
Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:05 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
>> On my openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 system running v2.6.24-rc1-281-g22d2aa1,
>> I get the sysfs rename messages.
>
> Care to try this? Seems like a silly bug in the core if
> SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y. That's why we didn't catch this e
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:05 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> On my openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 system running v2.6.24-rc1-281-g22d2aa1,
> I get the sysfs rename messages.
Care to try this? Seems like a silly bug in the core if
SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y. That's why we didn't catch this earlier, sorry.
Thanks a lot
On my openSUSE 10.3 x86_64 system running v2.6.24-rc1-281-g22d2aa1, I get the
sysfs rename messages.
Using Greg's patch, nothing changed. The log results are:
sysfs: duplicate filename 'eth1' can not be created
WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:424 sysfs_add_one()
Call Trace:
[] sysfs_add_one+0x5c/0x
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 16:52 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:43:48PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:16:54PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 16:23 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:32:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:43:48PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:16:54PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 16:23 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:32:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > > From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Date: T
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 12:16:54PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 16:23 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:32:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:37:30 -0700
> > >
> > > > Kay, are we doing som
On Wednesday, 17 October 2007 12:17, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On 10/17/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 23:36, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 22:50, Jens Axboe wr
On Wed, Oct 17 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17 2007, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On 10/16/07, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, G
On Wed, Oct 17 2007, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On 10/16/07, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 0
On 10/16/07, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > >
On 10/17/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 23:36, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 22:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > On Tu
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 16:23 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:32:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:37:30 -0700
> >
> > > Kay, are we doing something wrong in userspace when renaming wireless
> > > devices such that
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 23:36, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 22:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 03:32:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:37:30 -0700
>
> > Kay, are we doing something wrong in userspace when renaming wireless
> > devices such that we can overlap names?
>
> It does it for all network devices,
From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:37:30 -0700
> Kay, are we doing something wrong in userspace when renaming wireless
> devices such that we can overlap names?
It does it for all network devices, I see this ugly message on every
single system I have from Fedora foo to RH
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:50:54PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 22:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 22:50, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > There are many traces like this in my
On Tue, Oct 16 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > There are many traces like this in my dmesg from 2.6.23-git3 (they don't
> > > appear for vanilla 2.6.23):
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > There are many traces like this in my dmesg from 2.6.23-git3 (they don't
> > > appear
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 06:50, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There are many traces like this in my dmesg from 2.6.23-git3 (they don't
> > appear for vanilla 2.6.23):
> >
> > <4>sysfs: duplicate filename 'ethxx1' can not be
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are many traces like this in my dmesg from 2.6.23-git3 (they don't
> appear for vanilla 2.6.23):
>
> <4>sysfs: duplicate filename 'ethxx1' can not be created
> WARNING: at /home/rafael/src/linux-2.6/fs/sysfs/dir.c:
Hi,
There are many traces like this in my dmesg from 2.6.23-git3 (they don't
appear for vanilla 2.6.23):
<4>sysfs: duplicate filename 'ethxx1' can not be created
WARNING: at /home/rafael/src/linux-2.6/fs/sysfs/dir.c:425 sysfs_add_one()
Call Trace:
[] sysfs_add_one+0x5c/0xc9
[] sysfs_create_lin
27 matches
Mail list logo
