Re: latest 2.6.23 git missing ACPI POWER_SUPPLY

2007-10-22 Thread Jeff Chua
On 10/22/07, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 22 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > > Frans Pop wrote: > > > I must say that having these relatively top-level ACPI settings > > > depending on something that is relatively buried away is not very > > > intuitive! That's reall

Re: latest 2.6.23 git missing ACPI POWER_SUPPLY

2007-10-22 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 22 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > Frans Pop wrote: > > I must say that having these relatively top-level ACPI settings > > depending on something that is relatively buried away is not very > > intuitive! Especially not since at first glance you don't really seem > > to need th

Re: latest 2.6.23 git missing ACPI POWER_SUPPLY

2007-10-22 Thread Alexey Starikovskiy
Frans Pop wrote: > Jeff Chua wrote: >> Just pulled latest linux-2.6, and couldn't get ACPI to detect >> ACPI_BATTERY and ACPI_AC. >> >> It seems ACPI POWER_SUPPLY is still missing. > > I had the same problem. It turns out you need to enable >drivers -> Power supply class support > (either buil

Re: latest 2.6.23 git missing ACPI POWER_SUPPLY

2007-10-22 Thread Frans Pop
Jeff Chua wrote: > Just pulled latest linux-2.6, and couldn't get ACPI to detect > ACPI_BATTERY and ACPI_AC. > > It seems ACPI POWER_SUPPLY is still missing. I had the same problem. It turns out you need to enable drivers -> Power supply class support (either built in or as module) to get ACPI

latest 2.6.23 git missing ACPI POWER_SUPPLY

2007-10-22 Thread Jeff Chua
Just pulled latest linux-2.6, and couldn't get ACPI to detect ACPI_BATTERY and ACPI_AC. It seems ACPI POWER_SUPPLY is still missing. Thanks, Jeff. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http:/