Re: latencytop: optimize LT_BACKTRACEDEPTH loops a bit

2008-02-03 Thread Arjan van de Ven
Dmitry Adamushko wrote: --- Subject: latencytop: optimize LT_BACKTRACEDEPTH loops a bit. It looks like there is no need to loop any longer when 'same == 0'. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> looks good to me; Ingo can you queue this one up ? -- To unsub

Re: latencytop: optimize LT_BACKTRACEDEPTH loops a bit

2008-02-03 Thread Dmitry Adamushko
On 03/02/2008, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > > Subject: latencytop: optimize LT_BACKTRACEDEPTH loops a bit. > > > > It looks like there is no need to loop any longer when 'same == 0'. > > thanks for the contri

Re: latencytop: optimize LT_BACKTRACEDEPTH loops a bit

2008-02-02 Thread Arjan van de Ven
Dmitry Adamushko wrote: Subject: latencytop: optimize LT_BACKTRACEDEPTH loops a bit. It looks like there is no need to loop any longer when 'same == 0'. thanks for the contribution! while I like your patch, I wonder if we should go even a little further in cleaning this up @@ -73

latencytop: optimize LT_BACKTRACEDEPTH loops a bit

2008-02-02 Thread Dmitry Adamushko
Subject: latencytop: optimize LT_BACKTRACEDEPTH loops a bit. It looks like there is no need to loop any longer when 'same == 0'. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/kernel/latencytop.c b/kernel/latencytop.c index b4e3c85..61f7da0 100644 --- a/ker