Re: kvm lockdep splat with 3.8-rc1+

2013-01-05 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 08:00:19PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > Jiri posted similar locking issue at > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/4/380 > > Take a look? Yeah, it looks like the same issue. I'll try his patch on Monday. Thanks for letting me know. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. -- To unsubs

Re: kvm lockdep splat with 3.8-rc1+

2012-12-26 Thread Borislav Petkov
Hi Hillf, On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 08:18:13PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > Can you please test with 5a505085f0 and 4fc3f1d66b reverted? sure can do, but am travelling ATM so I'll run it with the reverted commits when I get back next week. Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. -- To unsubscribe from

Re: kvm lockdep splat with 3.8-rc1+

2012-12-26 Thread Hillf Danton
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > Hi all, > > just saw this in dmesg while running -rc1 + tip/master: > > > [ 6983.694615] = > [ 6983.694617] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] > [ 6983.694620] 3.8.0-rc1+ #26 Not tainte

kvm lockdep splat with 3.8-rc1+

2012-12-25 Thread Borislav Petkov
Hi all, just saw this in dmesg while running -rc1 + tip/master: [ 6983.694615] = [ 6983.694617] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 6983.694620] 3.8.0-rc1+ #26 Not tainted [ 6983.694621] - [ 6983.