Re: kmemleak reports in kernel 3.9.5+

2013-06-17 Thread Ben Greear
On 06/13/2013 08:50 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 01:28:13AM +0100, Ben Greear wrote: On 06/11/2013 12:52 PM, Ben Greear wrote: On 06/10/2013 03:32 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: On 10 June 2013 19:22, Ben Greear wrote: We had a system go OOM while doing lots of wireless sta

Re: kmemleak reports in kernel 3.9.5+

2013-06-13 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 01:28:13AM +0100, Ben Greear wrote: > On 06/11/2013 12:52 PM, Ben Greear wrote: > > On 06/10/2013 03:32 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > >> On 10 June 2013 19:22, Ben Greear wrote: > >>> We had a system go OOM while doing lots of wireless > >>> stations. (System had 8GB of RAM

Re: kmemleak reports in kernel 3.9.5+

2013-06-13 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 08:52:41PM +0100, Ben Greear wrote: > On 06/10/2013 03:32 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On 10 June 2013 19:22, Ben Greear wrote: > >> We had a system go OOM while doing lots of wireless > >> stations. (System had 8GB of RAM, so I suspect a leak). > >> > >> I enabled kmeml

Re: kmemleak reports in kernel 3.9.5+

2013-06-11 Thread Ben Greear
On 06/11/2013 12:52 PM, Ben Greear wrote: On 06/10/2013 03:32 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: On 10 June 2013 19:22, Ben Greear wrote: We had a system go OOM while doing lots of wireless stations. (System had 8GB of RAM, so I suspect a leak). I enabled kmemleak in a 3.9.5 (plus some local patches

Re: kmemleak reports in kernel 3.9.5+

2013-06-11 Thread Ben Greear
On 06/10/2013 03:32 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: On 10 June 2013 19:22, Ben Greear wrote: We had a system go OOM while doing lots of wireless stations. (System had 8GB of RAM, so I suspect a leak). I enabled kmemleak in a 3.9.5 (plus some local patches) and I see the entries below. Any idea if

Re: kmemleak reports in kernel 3.9.5+

2013-06-11 Thread Ben Greear
On 06/10/2013 03:32 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote: On 10 June 2013 19:22, Ben Greear wrote: We had a system go OOM while doing lots of wireless stations. (System had 8GB of RAM, so I suspect a leak). I enabled kmemleak in a 3.9.5 (plus some local patches) and I see the entries below. Any idea if

Re: kmemleak reports in kernel 3.9.5+

2013-06-10 Thread Catalin Marinas
On 10 June 2013 19:22, Ben Greear wrote: > We had a system go OOM while doing lots of wireless > stations. (System had 8GB of RAM, so I suspect a leak). > > I enabled kmemleak in a 3.9.5 (plus some local patches) and > I see the entries below. Any idea if these are real or not? > > unreferenced

kmemleak reports in kernel 3.9.5+

2013-06-10 Thread Ben Greear
We had a system go OOM while doing lots of wireless stations. (System had 8GB of RAM, so I suspect a leak). I enabled kmemleak in a 3.9.5 (plus some local patches) and I see the entries below. Any idea if these are real or not? unreferenced object 0x880212281c80 (size 128): comm "systemd