On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, dean gaudet wrote:
> anyhow a real network benchmark might show that kHTTPd latency is actually
> not as broken as this one indicates. i'd however really hesitate to call
> this a win.
Well as Arjan says: khttpd starves userspace and that might cause the
latency. I dont hav
a few comments...
- localhost is a meaningless benchmark. it's useful to catch some low
hanging fruit, but it really doesn't help in the long run.
- contrast the max connection times between kHTTPd and Boa. if that 9
second maximum for kHTTPd is any indication of its latency performance on
a r
I applied the persistent khttpd patch + my vhost patch and now khttpd
beats boa!!! (patch against 2.4.0 follows at the end of the message)
The connection times of boa are still better but khttpd wins in transfers.
Re: TUX: Way WAAAYYY too much overkill.
clameter@melchi:~$ ./zb localhost /index.
3 matches
Mail list logo
