Re: kernel-trace: Fine-tuning for seven function implementations

2017-05-22 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 22 May 2017 09:45:27 +0200 SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > I wont be touching or even looking at these until after 4.12-rc1 is > > released. Feel free to reply to this email with a ping in a week or > > two. > > *ping* > > How do you think about to give these update suggestions another l

Re: kernel-trace: Fine-tuning for seven function implementations

2017-05-22 Thread SF Markus Elfring
> I wont be touching or even looking at these until after 4.12-rc1 is released. > Feel free to reply to this email with a ping in a week or two. *ping* How do you think about to give these update suggestions another look? Regards, Markus

Re: kernel-trace: Fine-tuning for seven function implementations

2017-05-05 Thread SF Markus Elfring
> Just to let you know, it's never a good idea to send new patches out > during the merge window. Thanks for such information. > They are most likely to be missed and forgotten during this time. This can happen then occasionally. > Unless they are critical bug fixes, it's best to wait till af

Re: [PATCH 0/7] kernel-trace: Fine-tuning for seven function implementations

2017-05-05 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 5 May 2017 23:00:41 +0200 SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 22:50:05 +0200 > > A few update suggestions were taken into account > from static source code analysis. > > Markus Elfring (7): Hi Markus, Just to let you know, it's never a good idea to

[PATCH 0/7] kernel-trace: Fine-tuning for seven function implementations

2017-05-05 Thread SF Markus Elfring
From: Markus Elfring Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 22:50:05 +0200 A few update suggestions were taken into account from static source code analysis. Markus Elfring (7): Combine two function calls into one in hist_trigger_entry_print() Replace five seq_puts() calls by seq_putc() Adjust two checks f