Re: irq/0/smp_affinity =3 doesn't seem to work

2006-12-05 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 21:14 +0200, Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote: > On 12/5/06, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 18:30 +0200, Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote: > > > hello. > > > > > > I have a dual cpu AMD machine, I noticed that > > > only one timer0 is working in /pro

Re: irq/0/smp_affinity =3 doesn't seem to work

2006-12-05 Thread Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
On 12/5/06, Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 18:30 +0200, Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote: > hello. > > I have a dual cpu AMD machine, I noticed that > only one timer0 is working in /proc/interrutps. > setting proc/irq/0/smp_affinity to 3 does make > any difference. i

Re: irq/0/smp_affinity =3 doesn't seem to work

2006-12-05 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 18:30 +0200, Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote: > hello. > > I have a dual cpu AMD machine, I noticed that > only one timer0 is working in /proc/interrutps. > setting proc/irq/0/smp_affinity to 3 does make > any difference. if you set it to 3 then the chipset gets to decide where t

irq/0/smp_affinity =3 doesn't seem to work

2006-12-05 Thread Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
hello. I have a dual cpu AMD machine, I noticed that only one timer0 is working in /proc/interrutps. setting proc/irq/0/smp_affinity to 3 does make any difference. setting smp_affinity to 2 does move the inetrrupts. the above applys with or withour irq_balancer . thank you -- Raz - To unsubscri