matthieu castet wrote:
Hi Alan,
Alan Cox wrote:
On Sad, 2005-07-02 at 15:14, matthieu castet wrote:
Also I was wondering if all the sector that ide-cd failed to read are
bad sector, or if ide-cd failed to put the drive in a consistent
state for reading the next sector after corrupted one.
On Saturday 02 July 2005 17:14, matthieu castet wrote:
> IIRC on 2.4 kernel there wasn't such problem, I even managed to recover
> some damaged disk...
Oh on some 2.4 the kernel would retry each sector so many times that recovering
undamaged sectors from a CD would have taken longer than the MTB
Hi Alan,
Alan Cox wrote:
On Sad, 2005-07-02 at 15:14, matthieu castet wrote:
Also I was wondering if all the sector that ide-cd failed to read are
bad sector, or if ide-cd failed to put the drive in a consistent state
for reading the next sector after corrupted one.
ide-cd wrongly errors a
On Sad, 2005-07-02 at 15:14, matthieu castet wrote:
> Also I was wondering if all the sector that ide-cd failed to read are
> bad sector, or if ide-cd failed to put the drive in a consistent state
> for reading the next sector after corrupted one.
ide-cd wrongly errors all the sectors around an
4 matches
Mail list logo
