On Saturday 03 September 2005 11:26, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Denis,
>
> BTW...
>
> > Please be informed that there are lots of intNN_t's in i2c dir
> > tho...
>
> I couldn't find any. What were you refering to exactly?
Sorry I was wrong. While kernel has ~15000 [u]intNN_t's
they are all _not_
Hi Denis,
BTW...
> Please be informed that there are lots of intNN_t's in i2c dir
> tho...
I couldn't find any. What were you refering to exactly?
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mor
Hi Denis,
> --- linux-2.6.12.src/drivers/i2c/chips/via686a.c.orig Sun Jun 19 16:10:10 2005
> +++ linux-2.6.12.src/drivers/i2c/chips/via686a.c Tue Aug 30 00:21:39 2005
> @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static inline u8 FAN_TO_REG(long rpm, in
> but the function is very linear in the useful range (0-80 d
On Thursday 01 September 2005 18:59, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:10:14AM +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > Not tested, but it's rather obvious.
>
> Except you forgot a "Signed-off-by:" line...
>
> > --- linux-2.6.12.src/drivers/i2c/chips/via686a.c.orig Sun Jun 19
> > 16:10:1
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:10:14AM +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> Not tested, but it's rather obvious.
Except you forgot a "Signed-off-by:" line...
> --- linux-2.6.12.src/drivers/i2c/chips/via686a.c.orig Sun Jun 19 16:10:10 2005
> +++ linux-2.6.12.src/drivers/i2c/chips/via686a.c Tue Aug 30 0
Not tested, but it's rather obvious.
--
vda
--- linux-2.6.12.src/drivers/i2c/chips/via686a.c.orig Sun Jun 19 16:10:10 2005
+++ linux-2.6.12.src/drivers/i2c/chips/via686a.c Tue Aug 30 00:21:39 2005
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static inline u8 FAN_TO_REG(long rpm, in
but the function is very linear in the
6 matches
Mail list logo