Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

Hi Matthew, Am 18.06.2013 19:23, schrieb Matthew O'Connor: > Because all of my submissions are damaged and I haven't had the time > to correct them or my badly configured email clients. Trust me this > affects me in the exact same way it does you; I'll try to redo the > patches and send them upst

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

Because all of my submissions are damaged and I haven't had the time to correct them or my badly configured email clients. Trust me this affects me in the exact same way it does you; I'll try to redo the patches and send them upstream soon, for all our sake's. On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Sma

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

Am 13.06.2013 03:15, schrieb Ben Hutchings: > On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 19:17 -0400, Matthew O'Connor wrote: >> This is the backported patch I submitted previously. Hopefully this time >> around it won't be too messed up, I'm using Thunderbird instead of the >> web interface. > [...] > > This was whi

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 19:17 -0400, Matthew O'Connor wrote: > This is the backported patch I submitted previously. Hopefully this > time around it won't be too messed up, I'm using Thunderbird instead of > the web interface. [...] This was whitespace-damaged; please read Documentation/email-client

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:01:53AM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote: > Am 23.05.2013 14:46, schrieb Matthew O'Connor: > > On 05/23/2013 06:24 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote: > >> node02:/ocfs2/usr/src/linux-3.4.46# cat drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c.rej

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

From: Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 03:01:53 +0200 > Am 23.05.2013 14:46, schrieb Matthew O'Connor: >> On 05/23/2013 06:24 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote: >>> node02:/ocfs2/usr/src/linux-3.4.46# cat drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c.rej >> M

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

Am 23.05.2013 14:46, schrieb Matthew O'Connor: > On 05/23/2013 06:24 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote: >> node02:/ocfs2/usr/src/linux-3.4.46# cat drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c.rej > My most sincere apologies - one more time, from a different mail server > that hopefully won't g

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

Am 23.05.2013 14:35, schrieb Matthew O'Connor: > On 05/23/2013 06:24 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote: >> Hm, i tried to apply it to 3.4.46 but it does not work: >> >> node02:/ocfs2/usr/src/linux-3.4.46# patch -p1 <../bridge-patch-3.4.46 >> patching file drivers/net/bonding/bond

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

On 05/23/2013 06:24 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote: > node02:/ocfs2/usr/src/linux-3.4.46# cat drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c.rej My most sincere apologies - one more time, from a different mail server that hopefully won't go around changing my attachments. If this doesn't wor

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

On 05/23/2013 06:24 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote: > Hm, i tried to apply it to 3.4.46 but it does not work: > > node02:/ocfs2/usr/src/linux-3.4.46# patch -p1 <../bridge-patch-3.4.46 > patching file drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 704. > 1 out of 1 hunk FAI

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

Am 23.05.2013 01:17, schrieb Matthew O'Connor: > This is the backported patch I submitted previously. Hopefully this > time around it won't be too messed up, I'm using Thunderbird instead of > the web interface. I have applied it successfully and without warnings > against 3.4.46. It builds, but

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

This is the backported patch I submitted previously. Hopefully this time around it won't be too messed up, I'm using Thunderbird instead of the web interface. I have applied it successfully and without warnings against 3.4.46. It builds, but is otherwise untested beyond what I did when I origina

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 02:54:57PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote: > Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote: > > >Am 22.05.2013 22:04, schrieb Greg KH: > > > > > >>> > >>> https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net-next/+/567b871e503316b0927e54a3d7c86d50b722d955%5E!

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

Am 22.05.2013 23:54, schrieb Jay Vosburgh: > Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote: > >> Am 22.05.2013 22:04, schrieb Greg KH: >> >> https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net-next/+/567b871e503316b0927e54a3d7c86d50b722d955%5E!/ >>> >>> Ok, that's wh

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote: >Am 22.05.2013 22:04, schrieb Greg KH: > > >>> >>> https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net-next/+/567b871e503316b0927e54a3d7c86d50b722d955%5E!/ >> >> Ok, that's what we need. >> >> Now, please cc: the developers / ma

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

Hi Greg, Am 22.05.2013 22:04, schrieb Greg KH: >> >> https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net-next/+/567b871e503316b0927e54a3d7c86d50b722d955%5E!/ > > Ok, that's what we need. > > Now, please cc: the developers / maintainers of that patch and ask them > to have it

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:35:11PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Am 22.05.2013 21:06, schrieb Greg KH:> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:16:25PM > +0200, > Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> Am 22.05.2013 18:23, schrieb G

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

Hi Greg, Am 22.05.2013 21:06, schrieb Greg KH:> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:16:25PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> Am 22.05.2013 18:23, schrieb Greg KH: >>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:16:11PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote: Am

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:16:25PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote: > Hi, > > > Am 22.05.2013 18:23, schrieb Greg KH: > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:16:11PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian > > Wiessner wrote: > >> Am 22.05.2013 15:57, schrieb Greg KH: > >>> On W

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

Hi, Am 22.05.2013 18:23, schrieb Greg KH: > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:16:11PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian > Wiessner wrote: >> Am 22.05.2013 15:57, schrieb Greg KH: >>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:36:09PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian >>> Wiessner wrote: Hi, >>

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 06:16:11PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote: > Am 22.05.2013 15:57, schrieb Greg KH: > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:36:09PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian > > Wiessner wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> why is this patch still not backported to 3.4?

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

Hi, Am 22.05.2013 15:57, schrieb Greg KH: > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:36:09PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian > Wiessner wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> why is this patch still not backported to 3.4? >> >> I today tried 3.4.46 from kernel.org, but the patch STILL seems _NOT_ >> included? >> >>

Re: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:36:09PM +0200, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian Wiessner wrote: > Hi, > > > why is this patch still not backported to 3.4? > > I today tried 3.4.46 from kernel.org, but the patch STILL seems _NOT_ > included? > > > WHY IS THAT? This is not the correct way to su

https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/531

Hi, why is this patch still not backported to 3.4? I today tried 3.4.46 from kernel.org, but the patch STILL seems _NOT_ included? WHY IS THAT? == 3.4 Series == diff -uprN linux-3.4.28/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c linux-3.4.28-patched/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c --- linux-3.4.28