Re: high-res-timers start code.

2001-04-24 Thread george anzinger
Gabriel Paubert wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, george anzinger wrote: > > > "Robert H. de Vries" wrote: > > > > > > On Monday 23 April 2001 19:45, you wrote: > > > > > > > By the way, is the user land stuff the same for all "arch"s? > > > > > > Not if you plan to handle the CPU cycle counter in

Re: high-res-timers start code.

2001-04-24 Thread Gabriel Paubert
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, george anzinger wrote: > "Robert H. de Vries" wrote: > > > > On Monday 23 April 2001 19:45, you wrote: > > > > > By the way, is the user land stuff the same for all "arch"s? > > > > Not if you plan to handle the CPU cycle counter in user space. That is at > > least what

Re: high-res-timers start code.

2001-04-23 Thread Robert H. de Vries
On Monday 23 April 2001 22:43, George Anzinger wrote: > "Robert H. de Vries" wrote: > > On Monday 23 April 2001 19:45, you wrote: > > > By the way, is the user land stuff the same for all "arch"s? > > > > Not if you plan to handle the CPU cycle counter in user space. That is at > > least what I w

high-res-timers start code.

2001-04-23 Thread george anzinger
"Robert H. de Vries" wrote: > > On Monday 23 April 2001 19:45, you wrote: > > > By the way, is the user land stuff the same for all "arch"s? > > Not if you plan to handle the CPU cycle counter in user space. That is at > least what I would propose. Just got interesting, lets let the world look