Re: heavy nfs[4]] causes fs badness Was: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)

2007-01-24 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Florin Iucha wrote: > > It would be nice to learn exactly why the keyboard stopped working. Try > > using the usbmon facility (instructions in Documentation/usb/usbmon.txt) > > to see what happens when you type on the dead keyboard. Be sure to turn > > on CONFIG_USB_DEBUG as

Re: heavy nfs[4]] causes fs badness Was: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)

2007-01-23 Thread Florin Iucha
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 10:58:29AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Florin Iucha wrote: > > > Jiri and Trond, > > > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 01:14:09AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > > On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Florin Iucha wrote: > > > > > > > All the testing was done via a ssh into t

Re: heavy nfs[4]] causes fs badness Was: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)

2007-01-15 Thread Alan Stern
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Florin Iucha wrote: > Jiri and Trond, > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 01:14:09AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Florin Iucha wrote: > > > > > All the testing was done via a ssh into the workstation. The console > > > was left as booted into, with the gdm ru

Re: heavy nfs[4]] causes fs badness Was: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)

2007-01-15 Thread Florin Iucha
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 11:11:13PM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > Florin Iucha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] > > > Based on this info, I think we can rule out any USB. I will try > > testing with NFS3 to see if the problem persists. Unfortunately there > > is no oops or anything in "

Re: heavy nfs[4]] causes fs badness Was: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)

2007-01-15 Thread Horst H. von Brand
Florin Iucha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Based on this info, I think we can rule out any USB. I will try > testing with NFS3 to see if the problem persists. Unfortunately there > is no oops or anything in "dmesg". Take a look at bz #7796, a NFS bug + fix. But my feelin is that this is o

Re: heavy nfs[4]] causes fs badness Was: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)

2007-01-14 Thread Florin Iucha
Jiri and Trond, On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 01:14:09AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Florin Iucha wrote: > > > All the testing was done via a ssh into the workstation. The console > > was left as booted into, with the gdm running. The remote nfs4 > > directory was mounted on "/

Re: heavy nfs[4]] causes fs badness Was: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)

2007-01-14 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Florin Iucha wrote: > All the testing was done via a ssh into the workstation. The console > was left as booted into, with the gdm running. The remote nfs4 > directory was mounted on "/mnt". After copying the 60+ GB and testing > that the keyboard was still functioning, I

Re: heavy nfs[4]] causes fs badness Was: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)

2007-01-14 Thread Trond Myklebust
On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 17:58 -0600, Florin Iucha wrote: > All the testing was done via a ssh into the workstation. The console > was left as booted into, with the gdm running. The remote nfs4 > directory was mounted on "/mnt". > > After copying the 60+ GB and testing that the keyboard was still >

heavy nfs[4]] causes fs badness Was: 2.6.20-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)

2007-01-14 Thread Florin Iucha
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 04:57:01PM -0600, wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 10:54:34AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > It's still possible that this is hardware related; perhaps some component > > just began to wear out. If you return to an earlier kernel, does the > > problem go away? > > As repor