On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:55:32AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 08:43 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > BTW (not related to gmail):
> > Are there any news regarding the buggy 451 handling in zmailer I'm
> > reporting again and again that regularly results in every single
> >
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:55:32AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 08:43 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > BTW (not related to gmail):
> > Are there any news regarding the buggy 451 handling in zmailer I'm
> > reporting again and again that regularly results in every single
> >
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 08:43 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> BTW (not related to gmail):
> Are there any news regarding the buggy 451 handling in zmailer I'm
> reporting again and again that regularly results in every single
> linux-kernel message sent to me being delayed by up to 13 hours?
Er, you'
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 06:35:11PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:03:54AM -0400, John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
> > > In the linux-kernel -list subscribers domain popularity
> > > analysis I got following results:
> > >
> > >2101 gmail.com
> > > 49 googlemail.com
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:18:21PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 05:55:55PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
...
> > The gmail is so popular, that with their somewhat rudimentary
> > inbound MTA software this kind of recipient masses take horrible
> > time to feed in... Mere 0
From: Matti Aarnio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 18:35:11 +0300
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:03:54AM -0400, John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
> > > In the linux-kernel -list subscribers domain popularity
> > > analysis I got following results:
> > >
> > >2101 gmail.com
> > > 49
Satyam Sharma wrote:
On 5/7/07, John Anthony Kazos Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the linux-kernel -list subscribers domain popularity
> analysis I got following results:
>
>2101 gmail.com
> 49 googlemail.com
> 46 gmx.de
> 41 redhat.com
> 33 yahoo.com
> 23 sus
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 05:55:55PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> In the linux-kernel -list subscribers domain popularity
> analysis I got following results:
>
>2101 gmail.com
> 49 googlemail.com
> 46 gmx.de
> 41 redhat.com
> 33 yahoo.com
> 23 suse.de
> 22 gmx.net
On 5/7/07, John Anthony Kazos Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the linux-kernel -list subscribers domain popularity
> analysis I got following results:
>
>2101 gmail.com
> 49 googlemail.com
> 46 gmx.de
> 41 redhat.com
> 33 yahoo.com
> 23 suse.de
> 22 gmx.net
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 11:03:54AM -0400, John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
> > In the linux-kernel -list subscribers domain popularity
> > analysis I got following results:
> >
> >2101 gmail.com
> > 49 googlemail.com
> > 46 gmx.de
> How about some elitism here? Dedicate a certai
> In the linux-kernel -list subscribers domain popularity
> analysis I got following results:
>
>2101 gmail.com
> 49 googlemail.com
> 46 gmx.de
> 41 redhat.com
> 33 yahoo.com
> 23 suse.de
> 22 gmx.net
> 21 comcast.net
>
>
> The gmail is so popular, that
In the linux-kernel -list subscribers domain popularity
analysis I got following results:
2101 gmail.com
49 googlemail.com
46 gmx.de
41 redhat.com
33 yahoo.com
23 suse.de
22 gmx.net
21 comcast.net
The gmail is so popular, that with their somewhat rudimen
12 matches
Mail list logo