, you
can send the confirmation code
99427480 to bjs3...@gmail.com.
Thanks for using Gmail!
Sincerely,
The Gmail Team
If you do not approve of this request, no further action is required.
bjs3...@gmail.com cannot automatically forward messages to your email address
unless you confirm the reque
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 03:25:07PM +0800, 张宁 wrote:
> Hi, everyone
>
> I notice each developer in this email list has a company email address
> or Gmail, or maybe selfhosted email.
>
> last night I have tried my outlook.com, yahoo.com, QQ.com email, all
> of them are reject
Hi, everyone
I notice each developer in this email list has a company email address
or Gmail, or maybe selfhosted email.
last night I have tried my outlook.com, yahoo.com, QQ.com email, all
of them are rejected by mechine.
I'm new to this community, don't know the history, could som
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 15:27:31 +0200, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> All of that may be correct, but those headers apparently do break
> email based patch reviewing on Thunderbird and Gmail now, and that's
> not very likely to change. If we continue with our current practice,
> we'
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 6:27 AM Andreas Grünbacher
wrote:
>
> All of that may be correct, but those headers apparently do break
> email based patch reviewing on Thunderbird and Gmail now, and that's
> not very likely to change.
I do want to point out that at least for me, it
lly hard to read, because that:
>> >
>> > Content-Disposition: inline
>> >
>> > makes gmail think it's flowed.
>> >
>> > Which works horribly badly for patches, surprise surprise.
>> >
>> > So I really wish quilt wouldn't do that
Hi Peter, Linus, Andreas,
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 19:14:20 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 09:47:34AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > I do note how quilt emails are really hard to read, because that:
> >
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> &g
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 09:47:34AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I do note how quilt emails are really hard to read, because that:
>
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> makes gmail think it's flowed.
>
> Which works horribly badly for patches, surprise surprise.
&
-vMtvH8Cq4LUgA2WkwCnC5bqzJb4
如果您点击此链接后发现它可能已损坏，请复制此链接并将其粘贴到新的浏览器窗口中。如果您无法访问此链接，则您可以将确认代码 662655547
发送至 yangjz1...@gmail.com。
感谢您使用 Gmail！
Gmail 小组敬上
如果您不批准此请求，则不需要执行进一步操作。除非您点击上面的链接确认此请求，否则 yangjz1...@gmail.com
就无法自动将邮件转发到您的电子邮件地址。如果您无意中点击了此链接，但并不想让 yangjz1...@gmail.com
自动将邮件转发到您的地址，请点击以下链接取消此验证
GMail doesn't sort E-Mail by the "Date" header, but by when the E-Mail
was received. As a result patches sent to the git ML and LKML (and
friends) show up out of order in GMail.
This series works around that issue by sleeping for 1 second between
sending E-Mails.
If you
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 10:45:27AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed a practice when the patches are submitted where I'm a bit
> confused about how it fits with the DCO.
>
> People are creating gmail accounts to send patches on behalf of t
On 09/11/2017 11:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 10:45:27AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I noticed a practice when the patches are submitted where I'm a bit
>> confused about how it fits with the DCO.
>>
&
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 10:45:27AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed a practice when the patches are submitted where I'm a bit
> confused about how it fits with the DCO.
>
> People are creating gmail accounts to send patches on behalf of t
Hi all,
I noticed a practice when the patches are submitted where I'm a bit
confused about how it fits with the DCO.
People are creating gmail accounts to send patches on behalf of their
company because the company's email configuration does not allow to send
patches or adds extra
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Does it work better if you store the (preferably app-specific) password in
> smtppass in .gitconfig?
No.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
Mor
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Andrey Utkin
wrote:
> After "Send this email? ([y]es|[n]o|[q]uit|[a]ll): y" prompt and
> before "Password for 'smtp://x...@gmail.com@smtp.gmail.com:587':"
> prompt I always have a delay of 2-3 minutes. It is weird! "Uns
On 1/3/16, Andrey Utkin wrote:
> After "Send this email? ([y]es|[n]o|[q]uit|[a]ll): y" prompt and
> before "Password for 'smtp://x...@gmail.com@smtp.gmail.com:587':"
> prompt I always have a delay of 2-3 minutes. It is weird! "Unsafe
> clients"
After "Send this email? ([y]es|[n]o|[q]uit|[a]ll): y" prompt and
before "Password for 'smtp://x...@gmail.com@smtp.gmail.com:587':"
prompt I always have a delay of 2-3 minutes. It is weird! "Unsafe
clients" are allowed in Gmail settings.
I experience this bot
On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 23:21:41 -0700
Eddie Kovsky wrote:
> Gmail (Web GUI)
>
> -Does not work for sending patches.
> +Gmail works fine for sending patches provided you do NOT use the web
> interface
> +and just use Gmail as an IMAP server with a text based email client.
I a
This patch provides a minimal configuration to set up Mutt for
submitting plain text patches using Gmail.
Signed-off-by: Eddie Kovsky
---
Documentation/email-clients.txt | 32
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/email-clients.txt b
Clarify that Gmail can be used to send patches, provided you use Gmail
as a server and avoid the Web UI.
Signed-off-by: Eddie Kovsky
---
Documentation/email-clients.txt | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/email-clients.txt b/Documentation/email
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> It's normal. I occasionally write quick replies while on my phone, and
> the f*cking android gmail app cannot do plain-text mode. There are
> open bug tickets about it:
>
>https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/de
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 08:12:40PM -0500, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> [...] and I would not be in the least surprised if this turned out to
> be yet one more problem with gmail
It is; Gmail will refuse to POP more than one copy of a mail to you,
no matter how many copies it recieves via dif
From: Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
MAINTAINERS |6 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index cad0882..5c4b7c3 100644
--- a/MAINTA
ount. Never regretted the step.
Sorry for suddently jumping into the discussion, my understanding is
that all the problems with Gmail are related to the web interface, if
you don't use it, or you use it only to read messages/sent messages
(no patches), everything is fine.
Am I correct?
No
On 7/13/07, Paolo Ciarrocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/13/07, Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Satyam Sharma schrieb:
Sorry for suddently jumping into the discussion, my understanding is
that all the problems with Gmail are related to the web interface, if
y
On 7/13/07, Tilman Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Satyam Sharma schrieb:
> And yet another patch falls victim to format=flowed ...
>
> I need some ideas here myself:
>
> I don't want to subscribe from my university mail account [...]
> Which leaves Gmail, [..
Satyam Sharma schrieb:
> And yet another patch falls victim to format=flowed ...
>
> I need some ideas here myself:
>
> I don't want to subscribe from my university mail account [...]
> Which leaves Gmail, [...]
Other E-mail providers do exist, some of them even free.
On 7/11/07, Alistair John Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 16:21:44 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 07:06:23PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > Which leaves Gmail, but Gmail has the flowed text disease (that
> > cannot be disable
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 16:21:44 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 07:06:23PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > Which leaves Gmail, but Gmail has the flowed text disease (that
> > cannot be disabled) and although Gmail offers SMTP/POP, our evil
> > proxy/NA
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 07:06:23PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> Which leaves Gmail, but Gmail has the flowed text disease (that
> cannot be disabled) and although Gmail offers SMTP/POP, our evil
> proxy/NAT setup here wouldn't let me make any use of it to access
> it from some
>
> On 7/11/07, Gerb Stralko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > This link will help:
> > http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/pc/#gmail
> >
> > Scroll down untill you see a yellow box section that say:
> > Gmail Tips
> > * If you w
On 7/11/07, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On 7/11/07, Gerb Stralko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> This link will help:
> http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/pc/#gmail
>
> Scroll down untill you see a yellow box section that say:
> Gmail Tips
the account has a
> 100 MB or so limit that wouldn't survive a week of lkml traffic.
>
> Which leaves Gmail,
You may also try free gmane service, <http://www.gmane.org>, that is
mail-to-news gateway that has "gmane.linux.kernel" news group that is a
mirror of lkml.
--
Hi,
On 7/11/07, Gerb Stralko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2) If you have a box available at home (or elsewhere), use that to
> relay mail through.
>
read linux mail from you gmail account. When you need to send a patch,
send it from a linux box using pine, but change the Fro
On 7/11/07, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And yet another patch falls victim to format=flowed ...
I need some ideas here myself:
I don't want to subscribe from my university mail account -- I like
to keep important messages on server, and the account has a
100 MB or so limit that wo
2) If you have a box available at home (or elsewhere), use that to
relay mail through.
read linux mail from you gmail account. When you need to send a patch,
send it from a linux box using pine, but change the From to your gmail
account. Like Jesper suggested works great! Best of both worlds
nother patch falls victim to format=flowed ...
I need some ideas here myself:
I don't want to subscribe from my university mail account -- I like
to keep important messages on server, and the account has a
100 MB or so limit that wouldn't survive a week of lkml traffic.
Which leaves G
to subscribe from my university mail account -- I like
to keep important messages on server, and the account has a
100 MB or so limit that wouldn't survive a week of lkml traffic.
Which leaves Gmail, but Gmail has the flowed text disease (that
cannot be disabled) and although Gmail offers SMTP/POP
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:55:32AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 08:43 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > BTW (not related to gmail):
> > Are there any news regarding the buggy 451 handling in zmailer I'm
> > reporting again and again that regular
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:55:32AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 08:43 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > BTW (not related to gmail):
> > Are there any news regarding the buggy 451 handling in zmailer I'm
> > reporting again and again that regular
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 08:43 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> BTW (not related to gmail):
> Are there any news regarding the buggy 451 handling in zmailer I'm
> reporting again and again that regularly results in every single
> linux-kernel message sent to me being delayed by up
On Tuesday 08 May 2007, David Miller wrote:
>From: Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 10:35:03 -0400
>
>> verizon forced me over to a gmail account by refusing this mailing list.
>> Now lkml seems to be refusing posts from my gmail account.
>>
From: Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 10:35:03 -0400
> verizon forced me over to a gmail account by refusing this mailing list.
> Now lkml seems to be refusing posts from my gmail account.
>
> Is there a reason?
I just forwarded to you a copy of a bounce
verizon, by refusing the lkml server, forced me into using a gmail account to
receive this list. But now gmail sent messages seem to be dropping off the
edge someplace, so lets see if a message posted through vz makes it...
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defen
verizon forced me over to a gmail account by refusing this mailing list.
Now lkml seems to be refusing posts from my gmail account.
Is there a reason?
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
t; >2101 gmail.com
> > > 49 googlemail.com
> > > 46 gmx.de
>
> > How about some elitism here? Dedicate a certain number of streams to
> > everything-except-gmail, so MTAs from the 21st century can get their mail
> > faster, and set the rest on gmai
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:18:21PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 05:55:55PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
...
> > The gmail is so popular, that with their somewhat rudimentary
> > inbound MTA software this kind of recipient masses take horrible
> > tim
; > >
> > >2101 gmail.com
> > > 49 googlemail.com
> > > 46 gmx.de
>
> > How about some elitism here? Dedicate a certain number of streams to
> > everything-except-gmail, so MTAs from the 21st century can get their mail
> > faster, a
t; 33 yahoo.com
> 23 suse.de
> 22 gmx.net
> 21 comcast.net
>
>
> The gmail is so popular, that with their somewhat rudimentary
> inbound MTA software this kind of recipient masses take horrible
> time to feed in... Mere 0.5-0.7 seconds per recipient, but..
; 23 suse.de
> 22 gmx.net
> 21 comcast.net
>
>
> The gmail is so popular, that with their somewhat rudimentary
> inbound MTA software this kind of recipient masses take horrible
> time to feed in... Mere 0.5-0.7 seconds per recipient, but..
>
> So far we hav
om
> 23 suse.de
> 22 gmx.net
> 21 comcast.net
>
>
> The gmail is so popular, that with their somewhat rudimentary
> inbound MTA software this kind of recipient masses take horrible
> time to feed in... Mere 0.5-0.7 seconds per recipient, but..
[...]
How about some
How about some elitism here? Dedicate a certain number of streams to
> everything-except-gmail, so MTAs from the 21st century can get their mail
> faster, and set the rest on gmail-only. Slows down gmail and speeds up the
> rest?
No need. gmail has done that slowing down all by themselv
> In the linux-kernel -list subscribers domain popularity
> analysis I got following results:
>
>2101 gmail.com
> 49 googlemail.com
> 46 gmx.de
> 41 redhat.com
> 33 yahoo.com
> 23 suse.de
> 22 gmx.net
> 21 comcast.net
In the linux-kernel -list subscribers domain popularity
analysis I got following results:
2101 gmail.com
49 googlemail.com
46 gmx.de
41 redhat.com
33 yahoo.com
23 suse.de
22 gmx.net
21 comcast.net
The gmail is so popular, that with their somewhat
55 matches
Mail list logo
