>Great, thank you for testing! I'll send a proper patch. How would you
>like to be credited with reporting? Just as 'Ubisectech Sirius
>' ?
Hello.
Please use 'Ubisectech Sirius' to credit the
report. Thanks.
Kalle Valo writes:
> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes:
>
>> "Ubisectech Sirius" writes:
>>
Hmm, so from eyeballing the code in question, this looks like it is
another initialisation race along the lines of the one fixed in commit:
8b3046abc99e ("ath9k_htc: fix NULL pointer dereference
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes:
> "Ubisectech Sirius" writes:
>
>>>Hmm, so from eyeballing the code in question, this looks like it is
>>>another initialisation race along the lines of the one fixed in commit:
>>>8b3046abc99e ("ath9k_htc: fix NULL pointer dereference at
>>> ath9k_htc_tx_get_packe
"Ubisectech Sirius" writes:
>>Hmm, so from eyeballing the code in question, this looks like it is
>>another initialisation race along the lines of the one fixed in commit:
>>8b3046abc99e ("ath9k_htc: fix NULL pointer dereference at
>>ath9k_htc_tx_get_packet()")
>>Could you please test the patch
"Ubisectech Sirius" writes:
> Hello.
> We are Ubisectech Sirius Team, the vulnerability lab of China ValiantSec.
> Recently, our team has discovered a issue in Linux kernel
> 6.7.0-g9d1694dc91ce. Attached to the email were a POC file of the issue.
> Stack dump:
> general protection fault, proba
Hello.
We are Ubisectech Sirius Team, the vulnerability lab of China ValiantSec.
Recently, our team has discovered a issue in Linux kernel 6.7.0-g9d1694dc91ce.
Attached to the email were a POC file of the issue.
Stack dump:
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
0xdc000
6 matches
Mail list logo
