Re: gcc-2.95.3

: > Does anybody have bad experience with gcc-2.95.3? > > I'm using gcc-2.95.2 with linux 2.4.3 and have no problem with it. > > > Thanks, > Jeff > [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"

Re: gcc-2.95.3

Hi, On 06 Apr 2001, Jeff Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anybody have bad experience with gcc-2.95.3? > > I'm using gcc-2.95.2 with linux 2.4.3 and have no problem with it. I'm using gcc-2.95.3 for kernel compilation on latest 2.4.x since it&

Re: gcc-2.95.3

On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 08:49:51AM +0800, Jeff Chua wrote: > > Does anybody have bad experience with gcc-2.95.3? > > I'm using gcc-2.95.2 with linux 2.4.3 and have no problem with it. I've built and using 2.4.2 with 2.95.3 with no issues. [I should say, with no m

Re: gcc-2.95.3

You should be ok :) On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Jeff Chua wrote: > > Does anybody have bad experience with gcc-2.95.3? > > I'm using gcc-2.95.2 with linux 2.4.3 and have no problem with it. > > > Thanks, > Jeff > [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > > - > To unsubscribe f

gcc-2.95.3

Does anybody have bad experience with gcc-2.95.3? I'm using gcc-2.95.2 with linux 2.4.3 and have no problem with it. Thanks, Jeff [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More

gcc-2.95.3 release

Hi, gcc-2.95.3 has just been released. Could it be used for kernel compilation, or still better stick with gcc-2.91.66 for "absolute stability"? Thanks, Art. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTE

2.2.17 with Hedrick's IDE patch compiled with gcc-2.95.3-0.20000323

Hello, I saw announcement about new 2.2.18 release and notice about newer compilers. So I'm writing ... Since Sep 6 2000 I'm running kernel 2.2.17 with Andre Hedrick's IDE patch (2904) compiled with gcc-2.95.3-0.2323 (RedHat package). I'm runing it on Pentium III/650