On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 09:52:13PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > Julia,
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 14 2020 at 21:00, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >> That's clearly a false positive. Is there anything what
On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Julia,
>
> On Fri, Aug 14 2020 at 21:00, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> That's clearly a false positive. Is there anything what can be done to
> >> help that cocci script here?
> >
> > I have a better versio
Julia,
On Fri, Aug 14 2020 at 21:00, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> That's clearly a false positive. Is there anything what can be done to
>> help that cocci script here?
>
> I have a better version that needs to get pushed.
>
> But normally these pass through
On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14 2020 at 14:11, kernel test robot wrote:
> >
> > coccinelle warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> >
> >>> fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:2430:2-8: preceding lock on line 2413
> >
> > vim +2
On Fri, Aug 14 2020 at 14:11, kernel test robot wrote:
>
> coccinelle warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>
>>> fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:2430:2-8: preceding lock on line 2413
>
> vim +2430 fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
>
> 415cb800375cc4 Mark Fasheh 2007-09-16 2379
>
)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot
coccinelle warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:2430:2-8: preceding lock on line 2413
vim +2430 fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c
415cb80
6 matches
Mail list logo
