[PATCH 016/114] drivers: pcmcia: Kconfig: pedantic formatting

2019-03-11 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Formatting of Kconfig files doesn't look so pretty, so let the Great White Handkerchief come around and clean it up. Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult --- drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig | 20 ++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/dr

[PATCH] drivers: pcmcia: Kconfig: pedantic cleanups

2019-03-06 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult --- drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig | 20 ++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig b/drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig index fab92ba..1fc7ded 100644 --- a/drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/pcmcia

Re: drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig

2017-05-05 Thread as Bari
Thanks for feedback! This appears to be my internal issue. 2017-05-06 4:10 GMT+03:00 Randy Dunlap : > On 05/05/17 17:45, as Bari wrote: >> PCCARD entry has menuconfig type. This makes it invisible from, for >> example, gconfig, and we get additional pcmcia modules in builtin >> tree. This is unexp

Re: drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig

2017-05-05 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/05/17 17:45, as Bari wrote: > PCCARD entry has menuconfig type. This makes it invisible from, for > example, gconfig, and we get additional pcmcia modules in builtin > tree. This is unexpected behaviour. > Looks like the entry was improperly refactored since 2.6.24. What kernel version are y

drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig

2017-05-05 Thread as Bari
PCCARD entry has menuconfig type. This makes it invisible from, for example, gconfig, and we get additional pcmcia modules in builtin tree. This is unexpected behaviour. Looks like the entry was improperly refactored since 2.6.24. I would like to hear others' opinion.