On 9/6/19 9:20 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 09:10:08AM +0200, Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote:
It's definitely possible. I was just wondering whether it was necessary, but
it seems like it.
Yepp.
I've pushed a new version out (even hotter off the press) that doesn't
req
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 09:10:08AM +0200, Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote:
> It's definitely possible. I was just wondering whether it was necessary, but
> it seems like it.
Yepp.
I've pushed a new version out (even hotter off the press) that doesn't
require the region for dma_mmap_prepare, and a
On 9/6/19 8:32 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 07:05:43PM +0200, Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote:
I took a quick look at the interfaces and have two questions:
1) dma_mmap_prepare(), would it be possible to drop the references to the
actual coherent region? The thing is tha
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 07:05:43PM +0200, Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote:
> I took a quick look at the interfaces and have two questions:
>
> 1) dma_mmap_prepare(), would it be possible to drop the references to the
> actual coherent region? The thing is that TTM doesn't know at mmap time what
>
Hi, Christoph,
On 9/5/19 5:24 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 05:21:24PM +0200, Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote:
On 9/5/19 4:15 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the second batch of patches! These look much improved on all
fronts.
Yes, although the TTM funct
5 matches
Mail list logo