Re: delayacct regression in 2.6.24 git

* Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Am I missing something? > > > > delay accounting was causing context-switch slowdown because it > > called sched_clock() explicitly - but indeed my fix to that is wrong > > ... > > > > how about reverting the change but also using rq->clock inste

Re: delayacct regression in 2.6.24 git

Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, Ingo, >> >> I missed commit 75d4ef16a6aa84f708188bada182315f80aab6fa >> "sched: fix delay accounting performance regression" >> >> Without these changes, I find that delay accounting does >> not work as expected, I see zeros i

Re: delayacct regression in 2.6.24 git

* Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Ingo, > > I missed commit 75d4ef16a6aa84f708188bada182315f80aab6fa > "sched: fix delay accounting performance regression" > > Without these changes, I find that delay accounting does > not work as expected, I see zeros in the field for virtual,del

delayacct regression in 2.6.24 git

Hi, Ingo, I missed commit 75d4ef16a6aa84f708188bada182315f80aab6fa "sched: fix delay accounting performance regression" Without these changes, I find that delay accounting does not work as expected, I see zeros in the field for virtual,delay and count(s). CPU count real total vi