Re: cpu governor ondemand issue

2007-10-29 Thread Toralf Förster
Am Montag, 29. Oktober 2007 schrieb Arjan van de Ven: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:02:43 -0700 > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > And 2.6.23 was OK? > > > > Is this problem still present in Linus's current tree? > > and did you enable the "ignore nice levels" switch in sysfs ondem

Re: cpu governor ondemand issue

2007-10-29 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:02:43 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And 2.6.23 was OK? > > Is this problem still present in Linus's current tree? and did you enable the "ignore nice levels" switch in sysfs ondemand directory? -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use [EMAIL

Re: cpu governor ondemand issue

2007-10-29 Thread Toralf Förster
Am Montag, 29. Oktober 2007 schrieb Andrew Morton: > On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:16:14 +0200 Toralf Förster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I use the following one liner for regression tests of the cpufreq governor > > and > > friends: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ time factor 819734028463158891 > >

Re: cpu governor ondemand issue

2007-10-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:16:14 +0200 Toralf Förster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I use the following one liner for regression tests of the cpufreq governor and > friends: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ time factor 819734028463158891 > > which usually needs 5.5 secs to complete at 1.7 GHz of my pentium

cpu governor ondemand issue

2007-10-21 Thread Toralf Förster
I use the following one liner for regression tests of the cpufreq governor and friends: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ time factor 819734028463158891 which usually needs 5.5 secs to complete at 1.7 GHz of my pentium M processor. With the current git sources (commit cfa76f0 at Sat Oct 20 20:19:15 2007 -0