On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 02:55:01PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Oct 13 2007 14:47, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 02:28:00PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> scripts/checkpatch.pl doesn't seem to like this patch:
> >>
> >> $ scripts/checkpatch.pl m68k-export-asm-cachect
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 02:55:01PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On Oct 13 2007 14:47, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 02:28:00PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> scripts/checkpatch.pl doesn't seem to like this patch:
> >>
> >> $ scripts/checkpatch.pl m68k-export-asm-cachect
On Oct 13 2007 14:47, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 02:28:00PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> scripts/checkpatch.pl doesn't seem to like this patch:
>>
>> $ scripts/checkpatch.pl m68k-export-asm-cachectl-h.diff
>> ERROR: Does not appear to be a unified-diff format patch
>>...
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 02:28:00PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> scripts/checkpatch.pl doesn't seem to like this patch:
>
> $ scripts/checkpatch.pl m68k-export-asm-cachectl-h.diff
> ERROR: Does not appear to be a unified-diff format patch
>...
> --- a/include/asm-m68k/Kbuild
> +++ b/include/
scripts/checkpatch.pl doesn't seem to like this patch:
$ scripts/checkpatch.pl m68k-export-asm-cachectl-h.diff
ERROR: Does not appear to be a unified-diff format patch
Your patch has style problems, please review. If any of these errors
are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
CHE
5 matches
Mail list logo