Re: c6x linker issue on linux-next-20160808 + some linker table work

2016-08-11 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Mark Salter wrote: > On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 17:59 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:32:42AM -0400, Mark Salter wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 07:56 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> > > >> > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 07:04:09PM

Re: c6x linker issue on linux-next-20160808 + some linker table work

2016-08-11 Thread Mark Salter
On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 17:59 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:32:42AM -0400, Mark Salter wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 07:56 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 07:04:09PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed,

Re: c6x linker issue on linux-next-20160808 + some linker table work

2016-08-11 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:32:42AM -0400, Mark Salter wrote: > On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 07:56 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 07:04:09PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 23:30 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > OK thanks I've found a clean s

Re: c6x linker issue on linux-next-20160808 + some linker table work

2016-08-11 Thread Mark Salter
On Thu, 2016-08-11 at 07:56 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 07:04:09PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 23:30 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:04:07PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue,

Re: c6x linker issue on linux-next-20160808 + some linker table work

2016-08-10 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 07:04:09PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote: > On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 23:30 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:04:07PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 19:09 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > > > > > On Aug 9, 2016 6:50 P

Re: c6x linker issue on linux-next-20160808 + some linker table work

2016-08-10 Thread Mark Salter
On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 23:30 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:04:07PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 19:09 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > > > On Aug 9, 2016 6:50 PM, "Mark Salter" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2016-08-09 at

Re: c6x linker issue on linux-next-20160808 + some linker table work

2016-08-10 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 11:04:07PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote: > On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 19:09 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > On Aug 9, 2016 6:50 PM, "Mark Salter" wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 20:40 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:04:00PM -0400, Mark

Re: c6x linker issue on linux-next-20160808 + some linker table work

2016-08-09 Thread Mark Salter
On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 19:09 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Aug 9, 2016 6:50 PM, "Mark Salter" wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 20:40 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:04:00PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 06:37 -0700, Guent

Re: c6x linker issue on linux-next-20160808 + some linker table work

2016-08-09 Thread Mark Salter
On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 20:40 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:04:00PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 06:37 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > > > On 08/09/2016 01:11 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark, Aurelien, > > > >

Re: c6x linker issue on linux-next-20160808 + some linker table work

2016-08-09 Thread Mark Salter
On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 20:40 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:04:00PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 06:37 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > > > On 08/09/2016 01:11 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark, Aurelien, > > > >

Re: c6x linker issue on linux-next-20160808 + some linker table work

2016-08-09 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 01:04:00PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote: > On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 06:37 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 08/09/2016 01:11 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > > > Mark, Aurelien, > > > > > > I've run into a linker (ld) issue caused by the linker table work I've > > > been wor

Re: c6x linker issue on linux-next-20160808 + some linker table work

2016-08-09 Thread Mark Salter
On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 06:37 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 08/09/2016 01:11 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > Mark, Aurelien, > > > > I've run into a linker (ld) issue caused by the linker table work I've > > been working on [0]. I looked into this and for the life of me, I > > cannot compre

Re: c6x linker issue on linux-next-20160808 + some linker table work

2016-08-09 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 08/09/2016 01:11 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: Mark, Aurelien, I've run into a linker (ld) issue caused by the linker table work I've been working on [0]. I looked into this and for the life of me, I cannot comprehend what the problem is, so was hoping you folks might be able to chime in. F

c6x linker issue on linux-next-20160808 + some linker table work

2016-08-09 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
Mark, Aurelien, I've run into a linker (ld) issue caused by the linker table work I've been working on [0]. I looked into this and for the life of me, I cannot comprehend what the problem is, so was hoping you folks might be able to chime in. A snapshot you can use is available here: https://git