Re: bug in redhat gcc 2.96

2001-05-09 Thread Matt Wilson
This is because Jakub fixed it in GCC 3.0 CVS at the same time that he fixed it in 2.96-82, which was on the same day it was reported. It was broken in GCC CVS until that moment. Cheers, Matt On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 09:56:24AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > As this is with Red Hat's version of gcc

Re: bug in redhat gcc 2.96

2001-05-09 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Dan Kegel wrote: > OH. I kept looking for a package called 'kgcc'. Silly me. > > Guess it's time for a "How to compile a kernel on Red Hat 7.1" FAQ. The answer is that you can safely use gcc 2.96. No need to install kgcc or any other old compiler. LLaP bero - To unsubscr

Re: bug in redhat gcc 2.96

2001-05-09 Thread Dan Kegel
Stefan Hoffmeister wrote: > >Since there is no kgcc in RH71, > > There is an compat-egcs RPM (on CD2?) that contains kgcc. Took me a while > to find that. OH. I kept looking for a package called 'kgcc'. Silly me. Guess it's time for a "How to compile a kernel on Red Hat 7.1" FAQ. - Dan - To u

Re: bug in redhat gcc 2.96

2001-05-09 Thread Jeremy Hogan
This bug is fixed in gcc-2.96-82 and higher, as per http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37054. I've posted gcc-2.96-84.src.rpm at your enterprise ftp folder. --jeremy Jim Wright wrote: > > We believe we have found a bug in gcc. We have been trying to track > down why the .../d

Re: bug in redhat gcc 2.96

2001-05-09 Thread Stefan Hoffmeister
: On Wed, 9 May 2001 11:09:14 +0200 (CEST), Tobias Ringstrom wrote: >On Wed, 9 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote: >> > Any suggestions for a way to cope with this? We have a >> > customer who's system fails due to this. >> >> You can build 2.4 quite sanely with egcs-1.1.2 (aka kgcc) > >Since there is no

Re: bug in redhat gcc 2.96

2001-05-09 Thread David Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > This was fixed in 2.96-82, see: > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37054 > It was a bug in the if conversion optimization. So if I run up2date, will I get the fixed version? -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linu

Re: bug in redhat gcc 2.96

2001-05-09 Thread Tobias Ringstrom
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > Any suggestions for a way to cope with this? We have a > > customer who's system fails due to this. > > You can build 2.4 quite sanely with egcs-1.1.2 (aka kgcc) Since there is no kgcc in RH71, will you be releasing an updated gcc rpm, or is the best solut

Re: bug in redhat gcc 2.96

2001-05-09 Thread Alan Cox
> As this is with Red Hat's version of gcc, I'm not sending > this to the gcc folks. RPMs of gcc with this problem (If you have the time check 3.0 CVS doesnt show the same problem, the RH tree diverges from it so may well be unique in having the bug but many bugs are shared) > include gcc-2.9