Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory) (fwd)

2007-12-11 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:40 +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > I just noticed the same bug when I tried to update a 2.6.18 server to > 2.6.23.9 .. also tried 2.6.24-rc4. The symptom I'm seeing is that init > segfaults, or can't be found .. anyway, driver/fs errors. > > In the kernel config, un

Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory) (fwd)

2007-12-11 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 11:34 +0100, Anders Henke wrote: > Am 30.11.2007 schrieb FUJITA Tomonori: > > > > > According to the 2.6.23-rc1 short-form changelog, there is > > > > > one major edit on the dpt_i2o driver: > > > > > > > > > > FUJITA Tomonori > > > > > > > > > > [SCSI] dpt_i2o: conve

Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory)

2007-12-05 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 14:49:37 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c | 132 ++- > > > drivers/scsi/dpti.h|9 ++ > > > 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-) > > > > I've done the following: > > > > -u

Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory)

2007-12-05 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 11:14:41 +0100 Anders Henke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:30:54 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:11:55 -0800 > > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory)

2007-12-05 Thread Anders Henke
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:30:54 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:11:55 -0800 > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:04:03 +0900 > > > FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory)

2007-12-04 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:57:38 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:31:50 +0100 > Anders Henke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On November 28 2007, Anders Henke wrote: > > > As "everything is reported as being zero" is quite odd an Jan took a > > > guess that it m

Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory)

2007-12-04 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:30:54 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:11:55 -0800 > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:04:03 +0900 > > FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:57:38 -0800 > > > A

Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory)

2007-12-04 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:11:55 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:04:03 +0900 > FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:57:38 -0800 > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:31:50 +0100 > > > And

Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory)

2007-12-04 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:04:03 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:57:38 -0800 > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:31:50 +0100 > > Anders Henke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On November 28 2007, Anders Henke wrote: > >

Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory)

2007-12-04 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:31:50 +0100 Anders Henke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On November 28 2007, Anders Henke wrote: > > As "everything is reported as being zero" is quite odd an Jan took a > > guess that it might be block-layer or driver-related, I've assumed > > that the driver is responsible f

Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory) (fwd)

2007-11-30 Thread Anders Henke
Am 29.11.2007 schrieb Matthew Wilcox: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:45:57PM +0100, Anders Henke wrote: > > On Nov 29 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > > @@ -3295,7 +3295,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template adpt_template = { > > > .this_id= 7, > > > .cmd_per_lun= 1, >

Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory) (fwd)

2007-11-30 Thread Anders Henke
Am 30.11.2007 schrieb FUJITA Tomonori: > > > > According to the 2.6.23-rc1 short-form changelog, there is > > > > one major edit on the dpt_i2o driver: > > > > > > > > FUJITA Tomonori > > > > > > > > [SCSI] dpt_i2o: convert to use the data buffer accessors > > > > > > > > Stephen Rothwell

Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory) (fwd)

2007-11-29 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
m: Anders Henke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > Subject: Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in > > > directory) > > > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) > > > > > > On November 2

Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory) (fwd)

2007-11-29 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:45:57PM +0100, Anders Henke wrote: > On Nov 29 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > @@ -3295,7 +3295,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template adpt_template = { > > .this_id= 7, > > .cmd_per_lun= 1, > > .use_clustering = ENABLE_CLUS

Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory) (fwd)

2007-11-29 Thread Anders Henke
gt; - Forwarded message from Anders Henke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - > > > > Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:31:50 +0100 > > From: Anders Henke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was

Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory) (fwd)

2007-11-29 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
> > Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:31:50 +0100 > From: Anders Henke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in > directory) > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) > > On November

Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory) (fwd)

2007-11-29 Thread Jan Kara
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) On November 28 2007, Anders Henke wrote: > As "everything is reported as being zero" is quite odd an Jan took a > guess that it might be b

Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory)

2007-11-29 Thread Anders Henke
On November 28 2007, Anders Henke wrote: > As "everything is reported as being zero" is quite odd an Jan took a > guess that it might be block-layer or driver-related, I've assumed > that the driver is responsible for this; just out of the curiousity, > I've manually replaced the dpt_i2o driver by